The dilemma of juggling projects in software development: What’s the best approach to manage and expand your talent?

The dilemma of juggling projects in software development: What’s the best approach to manage and expand your talent?

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

Running a software development company has never been an easy task. It requires a unique blend of technical knowledge, creativity, and problem-solving skills to create high-quality products, with developers constantly building up their skills, handling many priorities at once, and carefully planning and organizing every step of the process to meet any client’s expectations. And because software development is so labor-intensive, it can be costly to do it improperly, so organizations must consistently evaluate their approach and make the appropriate adjustments, introducing new frameworks and techniques frequently to keep up with a rapidly changing landscape. Ultimately, a rigorous execution is essential for software organizations hoping to succeed in this highly specialized field.

The dilemma of juggling projects in software development: What’s the best approach to manage and expand your talent?

However, how do these challenges compound for an organization whose business approach is to act as a third-party developer for a variety of clients? How does a software company juggle between projects with such technical complexity? In today’s fast-paced world, development organizations need to be able to efficiently manage multiple projects at once to remain competitive, with success critically dependent on the ability to keep the focus on several projects at once, using their personnel and resources efficiently, and be constantly in the lookout for new opportunities without over-extending their capabilities or burning out the people who make this projects happen. And, of course, this is not an easy task.

Keeping your talent at hand

The Value Of Team Flexibility During Challenging Times: Why Is Dynamic Staffing Better?

Why software development companies often need to juggle multiple projects instead of working on just one at a time is not a mystery; it helps them better capitalize on short-term opportunities while effectively managing long-term projects of differing sizes and levels of complexity, thanks to the vast number of customers searching for innovative and cost-effective solutions to their software problems. For this reason, taking on multiple projects concurrently demands that a company is more than able to respond quickly and efficiently, producing a steady stream of quality work while meeting tight deadlines and even tighter budget constraints. So, it’s no wonder multitasking is so essential for software companies, not just concerning technological capabilities but also in terms of business strategy; with its emphasis on agility and flexibility, juggling several software development projects at once has become an invaluable asset for many modern businesses, allowing them to smoothly transition between phases of a project, and using resources most effectively, helping them leverage their strengths and stay ahead.

However, with so much pressure to deliver high-quality work in an efficient amount of time, there can be a strain on the resources of a company. The organization must have a flexible and coordinated approach to ensure every project is given its due attention before submission. Moreover, the team needs to be diligent without becoming too distracted by tasks from other endeavors, but striking a balance between pushing employees too hard or not utilizing them to their full potential can be difficult to maintain. In other words, the challenges associated with having multiple projects active simultaneously are nothing trivial, but if handled correctly great results can be expected from careful oversight and a dedicated team. 

But what is the biggest challenge at the heart of this?

It’s all about the engagement”, says Luis Aburto, CEO and Founder of Scio. “This kind of work revolves around engagements. An engagement is a contract where you are looking for expertise, and a company does resource allocation to ensure you have the people with the necessary knowledge, skill, and experience to successfully bring an engagement to a conclusion. Of course, these engagements vary widely from one client to another, and in the case of software development, you want to have a healthy mix of experts, like Front-Ends, Back-Ends, UX/UI designers, architects, QA, and so, matching with the goal you want to reach.”

However, this “resource allocation”, as Luis points out, happens at every level of the project, and it’s a constant effort to get right. Making sure that the right people are assigned to the right tasks is key to efficiently completing the project because, in theory, the right mix of people can bring the variety of skills, experience, and ideas necessary to quickly assess possible solutions to any encountered issues and determine the best solution. With the scheduling of tasks thoughtfully carried out, each member of the team should be able to collaborate effectively and focus on their responsibilities, underlining that correct talent management is the core component of a successful technical project. But for a Nearshore company like Scio, this kind of management brings an additional challenge when clients are looking for very specific expertise on their side.

For a company that does software development for external parties, it’s not enough to say that they have the expert on, say, iOS development that their clients are looking for, but also that he or she is available to join the project at a moment’s notice. And here is where things start to get more complex”, says Luis. If a company has the portfolio to show their experience at developing applications for iPhone, but all of their resident iOS experts are currently busy, then grabbing new projects can be infeasible. The obvious answer might be getting the right people ASAP so the opportunity is not lost, but you need to make sure those people are trustworthy, can join the team seamlessly, and can contribute to a positive outcome. And as a company that provides Nearshore support, that’s what we do.

After all, a software development company’s success often hinges on its ability to take on more projects, prioritize client needs, and maintain quality control. And while the best approach for a company to do this is to create a streamlined workflow with clearly defined tasks and deadlines that can easily scale up or down according to the specific project, this is not always doable. Is at this point when bringing talent through a trustworthy partnership is the best way to reach a client’s expectations, but what does that look like?

The balance between risk and opportunity

The dilemma of juggling projects in software development: What’s the best approach to manage and expand your talent?

Talent is the lifeblood of every software development project, and having the right people for the job is what guarantees a successful outcome. Nevertheless, it can be difficult to manage multiple development projects with limited resources in both small and large organizations. Nobody wants the team feeling overwhelmed, resulting in burnout, or developers having to take on more roles than they should to keep up with the workload, which often means that the organization has lost sight of the larger picture, leading to less-than-desirable results that affect the business as a whole. As we said before, balance is difficult to achieve. 

In consequence, finding that sweet spot of having a productive team without overworking them, and allowing for the freedom to take on more projects, is what makes a Nearshore partnership such an attractive option to software development organizations that need to keep moving forward with projects. Striking a healthy balance between what can be encompassed in a finite amount of time while keeping developers motivated and ready to take on challenges is no easy task, which often requires efficient task management and adaptation tactics to succeed. 

But what does it mean to have available people?”, asks Luis Aburto about the need to have wiggle room when taking on projects. “In the industry we use something we call ‘the bench’, which is a bit of a necessary evil but allows an organization to take on new projects with less friction. Otherwise, you would need to tell a client to wait for a couple of months to find and onboard the developer they need, and depending on the type of client, that might not be a realistic ask. You risk that business relationship, and that’s a position no organization ever wants, so managing the talent so you have enough free hands to help, but not so many that your overhead costs skyrocket without any productivity from them, is critical. So a software company should always have a bench of, let’s say, 5% of the total developers, available to take on new engagements, sometimes with internal projects that help people exercise their skills while a new opportunity arises. Because another cost of the bench is that people sitting on it for too long can feel wasted, or stuck, which is never a good mindset to have. So managing the bench and giving the team enough space to operate without burning out people, or leaving them behind, is the mark of a good organization. 

In short, working with Nearshore partners is the most effective way for software development companies to juggle multiple projects without sacrificing quality. It allows teams to keep their focus and maintain oversight on multiple projects at once, which increases efficiency and helps to ensure that each project reaches its completion deadlines on time. The added convenience of aligning time zones also means that there is always time for code review, debugging, and other support tasks, allowing clients to be more certain of the end product’s quality and reliability since it will have been tested on the same platforms as their own systems. 

By leveraging the power of Nearshore teams of developers with expertise in different technologies, companies can effectively spread out their workload while taking advantage of time-zone proximity and cultural similarities to drive faster results. The continuous delivery models used by Nearshore partners such as Scio can also minimize complexity and help accelerate production readiness, which all but guarantees a positive outcome on every project where having talent on hand is critical. It just needs the proper management to ensure everyone is ready to take on a new challenge.

The Key Takeaways

  • For any kind of software development organization, having the right amount of people ready to take on new projects is always critical.
  • However, managing people and resources needs to hit a delicate balance between breathing room to expand development, and keeping people productive at all times.
  • In these cases, expanding the number of people involved in a project through a development partnership might be the best approach.
  • After all, the idea is to keep moving forward with projects, but trying to cut down on everything that might get in the way of a positive outcome, like delays, absence of the appropriate expertise, budget, and deadlines.
  • With a Nearshore partner like Scio, having access to this expertise is easy, seamless, and guarantees room to always keep a project going.
The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

The success of any software development cycle relies entirely on the team behind it, and when developers don’t have enough resources to see the project through to its successful completion, it can be a costly outcome for an organization. But when too many resources are allocated at once on a project, unnecessary complexities can be introduced, likely increasing miscommunications and further hindering progress. So finding the perfect balance between talent and resources is essential for any company’s well-being, and flexibility in the size and resources of a team is key for optimal outcomes across the board.

The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

However, the matter of team size in a development environment is no joke, and deciding whether to scale or reduce a software development team can be a complicated situation. The main thing to remember, though, is that the size of a team should be driven by strategic needs, not only organizational cost savings, so to make the best decision, it’s essential to take into account the project objectives and timeline. If the aim is to launch quickly on limited resources but find lasting success, then scaling may be more advantageous than reducing the team. But, if the desired outcome is short-term and specialized resources are not needed, reducing might be the right move. Either way, having the right approach is critical. 

But what gets involved in such a decision? Scaling or reducing teams in software development is a real quandary because you (ideally) want to find the right number of people to dedicate to development projects, yet you also don’t want to over-commit resources that you probably can’t justify in the long run. And without good and exact data on the impact of different variables on the project, decision-making will be based on guesswork, which rarely ends well. 

And all this without mentioning the most important element of this whole situation: the people. It goes without saying, but the effects of reducing a development team after a project can be huge; not only the morale of the team is affected, but there’s the risk that it may lead to lower-quality outcomes. After all, when a member leaves, they not only take with them their knowledge and expertise but also affect the very relationship between collaborators and their organization; trust is the first thing to go after deciding that a dev team is too large to keep. So, it’s up to Management to assess the impact of reducing their team and attempt to lessen any fallout as much as possible, even if it means transferring individuals over to other projects or departments temporarily or permanently. 

However, what if this is just not possible for a mid-sized company with a small IT department? How can these organizations approach the dilemma of needing to develop a technological solution but don’t have the resources to hire and let go of the software professionals as they need? It’s important to weigh the various possibilities carefully when it comes to staffing software development initiatives — after all, it can spell the difference between success and failure.

The challenge of bringing talent

The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

When a mid-sized company wants to bring a software project to life, it often faces the challenge of attracting experienced developers willing to join these short-termed projects. These ventures (which can range from developing new platforms to introducing automation capabilities in existing programs and systems, to doing web design, building enterprise solutions, and even creating mobile apps and improving customer service through technological interventions) are often crucial to a company’s success, yet most experienced developers tend to opt for longer deals elsewhere with the idea that they are more secure. Furthermore, companies also have to compete with large corporate offers, which can seem unrealistic and exaggerated when compared to the smaller compensation packages they can provide, which leaves companies with few options other than recruiting those without less-than-adequate experience, which can be a very unattractive proposal. 

Sure, the gig economy has opened up new opportunities by connecting mid-sized businesses with freelancers who have proven skills and can step in on a project basis, finding reliable talent often requires larger upfront payments or higher premiums than they might otherwise use to onboard full-time employees, so negotiations need to carefully balance the requirements of the developer and what is expected of them with compensation that makes it worth their while. As a result, a mid-sized company must confront several dilemmas to ensure that this decision is successful and produces results: training new members of the team to be properly knowledgeable about the company’s process and demands, issuing the appropriate tools, managing organizational structure, providing timely support from senior management, and considering projections for future growth and corporate objectives without bankrupting the company, or cutting back on quality standards. In short, the challenges involved with scaling up a software development team aren’t something to be taken lightly, but solutions do exist.

If you’re a mid-sized business, achieving your software development goals may seem daunting. It’s expensive and difficult to build up an internal team of knowledgeable software developers in-house, so partnering with a Nearshore development organization can help you accomplish these ambitions without the worry of in-house management or heavy recruitment costs”, says Luis Aburto, CEO and Founder of Scio, a Nearshore development company located in Mexico. You’ll get access to talented developers trained across the stack that are just as effective as hiring your own team of engineers, and a company like Scio provides full project management support should you need it. So instead of going through the process of building a fixed team, you can easily adjust and tailor your talent depending on the progress being made. Giving yourself the comfortability to tune your team size at any given moment guarantees you won’t be hindered by slowdowns or lagging projects due to issues of manpower.

Flexibility as your best decision

The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

It’s a big step for any company to choose to scale up its software development teams or start it from scratch. Finding the right balance between cost-effectiveness, training, and onboarding new employees to ensure success is one of the many challenges that a mid-sized organization faces, which often needs to hire top talent while making sure the personnel is not too expensive for the size of its resources. 

That’s why the option of flexibility offered by an external partner, such as a Nearshore company, can be such a critical difference for mid-sized companies looking to accelerate their technology goals. It enables businesses to access top tech talent without the overhead of recruiting and maintaining a large onsite team, and the flexibility to scale up or down depending on the project goals and resources at hand with speed and precision. With access to a wide pool of experts, you get immediate access to the right combination of skills and experience that your business needs — all while keeping your budget under control. These external companies also have access to higher-quality tools, equipment, and technologies, which will ensure the success of your project in far less time compared to hiring in-house developers. What’s more, these dedicated teams are focused on specific project goals and are incredibly flexible, capable of scaling up or down as needed, giving businesses a tremendous amount of control over their software investments.

In short, for mid-sized businesses looking to take their operations to the next level, Nearshore providers offer an ideal staffing solution. Not only do these services provide access to high-skilled and experienced professionals, but they also offer substantial scalability and flexibility in terms of staff numbers. So, instead of having to employ specialized IT resources on a full-time basis, a Nearshore provider means that businesses can benefit from well-trained professionals on demand, meaning staffing levels can be easily adjusted based on need. This not only helps with cost savings initially, but it keeps staffing and project costs down more generally too – allowing your mid-sized business to truly maximize its opportunities in the modern digital economy.

The Key Takeaways

  • Nowadays, software development is a common component of almost any business, but that doesn’t mean that is easy to do.
  • For mid-sized organizations, acquiring talent for a software project is quite a task, for many reasons (costs, onboarding, requirements, etc.)
  • Competition, costs of development, and the finicky nature of the software industry means that these organizations might require alternatives.
  • Nearshore development, for this reason, might be the answer, offering talent, flexibility and expertise that any organization can access, regardless of size or the challenge of the project.

The “Jurassic Park” Problem: How to avoid having a rogue IT person wreaking havoc in your business?

The “Jurassic Park” Problem: How to avoid having a rogue IT person wreaking havoc in your business?

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

IT has become a vital element of modern businesses. It helps streamline complicated tasks like data management, customer communications, logistic planning, inventory tracking, and much more, and with a reliable IT infrastructure, businesses can identify new opportunities to secure better positions and increase success. Technology also increases the efficiency of employee productivity with tools such as remote collaboration platforms and automation solutions-enhancing operational agility, and (perhaps most importantly), businesses can gain an invaluable understanding of their customers by leveraging Big Data technologies which help gather customer feedback in real-time to make better decisions quickly. All in all, it becomes clear that modern businesses cannot survive without reliable IT support, making it the backbone of every successful organization today.

The “Jurassic Park” Problem: How to avoid having a rogue IT person wreaking havoc in your business?

However, the importance of IT means that, if not managed properly, this area can become a vulnerable spot for malicious activities. And we are talking about more than outdated systems or weak passwords; a lack of the proper protection and approach to the IT demands of a business can set off a chain reaction that leads to data loss, security breaches, and serious financial damages. To avoid such breakdowns, organizations should remain diligent in their approach to IT – regularly updating their systems and educating staff on how to protect confidential information. But sometimes, even this is not enough. Sometimes, the call comes “from inside the house”.

Let’s take a funny example of what we mean: Jurassic Park, a cinematic classic that depicted the consequences of human curiosity getting ahead of our technical knowledge and abilities. In the movie, the breakdown of the park is set by a chain reaction of deficient approaches to security, management, and technology, really underscoring how vital these security measures are, even for the most cutting-edge technology. Disaster can quickly occur when deficiencies or malicious actors are not addressed appropriately, perhaps offering an allegory for the high stakes involved with managing today’s cyber infrastructure. As illustrated throughout the film, underestimating risks carries great consequences, and whether computing networks, industrial structures, or hybrid environments, a secure foundation is key to avoiding catastrophic repercussions. 

Implementing best practices, such as authentication and encryption protocols, testing networks regularly and actively informing employees about threat scenarios can minimize risk and maximize resilience in any system. By providing a great storyline while emphasizing essential IT principles, this classic film reinforces why taking security precautions should always be considered—now more than ever before. For businesses or organizations handling sensitive data, individuals need to take initiative in understanding their responsibilities and roles in protecting corporate information from cyber-attacks or malicious use.

The human element of IT risk

The “Jurassic Park” Problem: How to avoid having a rogue IT person wreaking havoc in your business?

Arguably, one of the main points of Jurassic Park is showing why having less-than-ideal IT personnel causes all sorts of problems, and can be catastrophic for a business. By the nature of their job, they have access to sensitive data which, when put in the wrong hands, can be used for nefarious purposes, as well as let in malicious actors by neglecting to patch systems or by not monitoring user activity, allowing third-parties access to information they shouldn’t. Furthermore, they can misuse privileged access, delete data, or create accounts with admin privileges to keep the system and networks open to themselves. 

Ultimately, what a rogue IT person can do is put an entire business at risk outside of traditional cybercrime, giving competitors advantageous inside knowledge (just like the character of Dennis Nedry does in the movie) or manipulating software to perform unwanted tasks. Indeed, in most cases, the development of malicious software by an insider is virtually indistinguishable from cyberattacks by outside actors, so taking steps to secure your business and prevent unauthorized changes is essential if you want to protect your assets, resources, and brand reputation. In hindsight, taking full measures to prevent such situations is what protects businesses, ensuring they have policies and procedures in place to monitor the behavior of their IT staff, particularly when it comes to sensitive matters such as data access and storage. It’s important to review logs and technical security measures such as firewalls and system software patches to make sure they are up-to-date. However, you could say that these steps are more about mitigating potential harm done by disruptive people than outright preventing it. What is the best approach, then, to avoid falling into such circumstances?

Trust is the name of the game

The “Jurassic Park” Problem: How to avoid having a rogue IT person wreaking havoc in your business?

Contacting an experienced systems analyst or consultant may help offer an unbiased opinion on remediation strategies that can be implemented to address any issues caused by the rogue IT person. So, for any business looking to build an IT department, but doesn’t have much experience in the field, establishing trust with anyone tasked with handling digital infrastructure and sensitive data, is the most critical step of the whole project. So the correct approach must be taken.

Partnering with a Nearshore company can be an effective way to reduce the likelihood of a costly and embarrassing IT situation, for example. While keeping up with the latest software, security protocols, and technology trends can be difficult for in-house teams, hiring or contracting expertise from a Nearshore firm adds an invaluable layer of external expertise that businesses can use to protect themselves against bad IT situations such as data loss or system downtime by ensuring there is expert oversight built-in to their processes. Companies that partner with Nearshore organizations can rest assured knowing they have access to experienced professionals who will put the proper security measures into place while also minimizing risk, ensuring successful IT management nearby, with much easier access to issues that may arise. Additionally, with almost instantaneous communication, language barriers are far less of an issue; the nuances of various dialects and the distance between different countries ensure that experience with different cultures is taken into account to create an effective solution. 

Nearshore development partnerships offer a powerful combination of advantages to mid-sized businesses that are looking to outsource their IT work,” says Rodolfo Cruz, Project Management Officer and Partner at Scio. These partnerships are often more trustworthy than the alternatives, like freelancers or local talent, because they have accountability standards in place that provide substantial benefits in terms of quality assurance and accessibility. This is particularly important for mid-sized businesses as it removes the significant psychological burden placed on them when considering outsourcing — namely that something will go wrong or be impossible to address. With Nearshore development partnerships, these problems can largely be avoided as they meet agree-upon performance guarantees and have personnel who are accessible and easy to communicate with.” 

Because, when it comes to IT matters, trust is an invaluable asset. Every step in the process of acquiring and maintaining technology requires an element of trust – from trusting vendors to appropriately provide reliable hardware and software solutions, to relying on company employees to keep confidential data safe, trust is a necessary ingredient for any successful IT operation. By having the assurance that their data is handled properly, people and organizations can focus on the problems at hand rather than worrying about security breaches or technical hiccups. For any IT work to progress normally, all parties must be confident that systems are properly secured, that equipment functions as expected, and that sensitive information remains uncompromised. Establishing a clear chain of command within the IT department also helps establish a formalized reporting structure that prevents any single technician from having too much power or responsibility. Additionally, regular internal audits can help identify any unusual system activity and provide peace of mind that the network is secure. Finally, proper training for all personnel on new technologies and policies keeps everyone up to date and aware of security protocols, ensuring minimal disruption from rogue actions. With these safeguards in place and strong relationships built on trust between all players in a technology system, operations can safely proceed.

Avoiding the “Jurassic Park” problem 

In other words, to prevent rogue IT technicians from creating chaos in the workplace, it is essential to have extensive management policies and procedures in place. The lesson is that businesses must understand the potential risks associated with any technological system they implement, as well as the appropriate steps needed to achieve a safe operation. Individuals and companies alike need to be cognizant of evolving threats to create effective security initiatives. With its exciting plot, Jurassic Park serves as a parable for the need for sound practices in IT; we must remember not all advances come without inherent risk.

So, if you are looking for solutions regarding IT, Nearshore development partnerships can be the perfect solution for mid-sized businesses seeking to streamline their IT management. Companies that are willing to partner with companies in other countries gain access to a more comprehensive network of software engineers and talent with specialized skills. When searching for an effective IT solution, it pays to consider the advantages that come with selecting nearshore development partners. Taking these proactive steps to prevent a potential rogue IT person will minimize future conflicts, protect company assets and ensure everyone is looking in the same direction. As we can see from Jurassic Park, IT security is vital for maintaining a safe and efficient workplace environment, and without proper protocols in place, unauthorized users can access confidential data often leads to a catastrophic result that you can avoid with the proper people on your side.

The Key Takeaways

  • IT has become the backbone of most modern businesses, and as such, it can become both a strength and a weakness for a company for several reasons.
  • One such risk, for example, is having an IT technician using his position to damage the business, which can be crippling for a company, as illustrated by the movie “Jurassic Park”.
  • That’s why “trust” should be part of every IT process, and having the appropriate people to trust with such responsibility is critical for the well-being of a business.
  • Nearshore partnerships, for example, can guarantee this kind of trust, providing any business with the professionals they need to keep operations running well.
How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

Running an IT department is not an easy task. With a daily grind of patches, fixes, updates, and all sorts of technical hurdles, most IT professionals know that their workload can sometimes get too overwhelming, making a balancing act between short-term fixes necessary to keep systems running with long-term improvements to futureproof the network. And even with the best preparation, the job of IT can sometimes be challenging and unpredictable, usually with an impossibly long list of tasks that need to be completed. Nothing is ever easy; the person in charge has to navigate through a tangle of hardware and fix whatever problems are presented, while making sure their work will stand the test of time.

How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

However, there are ways to avoid those bad days when everything seems wrong. Taking the time to ensure that all of your to-dos are in order, that essential files and documents are safe, and that data backups are running will go a long way in avoiding panic if something goes wrong. If at all possible, allocate time each week for software updates or checking on vulnerable systems to save you hours of headaches down the road if a potential issue is caught early on. Finally, establishing a rapport with your colleagues is critical, as it ensures that everyone remains on the same page and problems can be easily spotted early on. But even with safeguards like these, things can go sideways in unexpected ways, which can test every ounce of the skill, patience, and determination of an IT professional.

In other words, without the proper support, IT departments face a difficult job, often leading to days from hell for your employees. But with the right partner in IT support, this looming dread becomes a thing of the past — free from these worries, your team can efficiently eliminate many of these time-consuming tasks and have more energy to dedicate to other projects and initiatives within their organization. This shift in priorities allows them to focus on driving technological advances rather than simply running from one issue to the next. With an experienced partner in IT services at your side, you’re setting your team on a clear path for growth that allows everyone to focus on doing their best work.

Avoiding a crisis

How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

Nobody wants days like these in IT, so it’s important to prepare and make a checklist of daily tasks to avoid spreading your attention too much. Keeping an eye on projects and deadlines, prioritizing tasks based on importance, blocking off time for large assignments, always saving work right away, and keeping the organization’s software up-to-date and running smoothly is a bit of standard advice that can save a lot of headaches in the long run. Nevertheless, in a mid-sized company, a crisis can still happen, and a fast and efficient resolution by the IT department is going to be pretty critical.

 The first approach, then, should include gaining an understanding of the full scope of any issue by identifying affected systems and data, as well as any potential implications on the business operations of the whole organization. Once the breadth of the problem has been established, it’s important to consider what methodologies and resources will be needed to manage the crisis properly. For instance, if there are significant hardware issues or a technical outage that needs attention, engaging an IT vendor or specialized contractor ensures that all personnel has the appropriate skill sets and qualifications for remediation. 

Moreover, creating a sound action plan for responding (for example) to customer questions and managing any legal repercussions from a breach can help minimize stress during such trying times. And while no one ever wants to deal with an IT crisis at their company, having a comprehensive plan that covers all possible angles ensures you can tackle it in an orderly fashion for smooth sailing throughout recovery. Time is always of the essence, so the best approach is developing a strategy that considers all stakeholders involved, with quick, proactive communication between departments and employees becoming essential for triaging the issue. It’s also important to be clear about the goals and expectations of the organization so everyone understands the urgency of addressing a problem before the situation gets worse. Having a good system in place to track progress will ensure rapid resolutions; if mistakes are made, acknowledging them quickly and openly with leadership sets the right tone to confront such issues. And seeking outside help when necessary is always a must.

When a crisis strikes, I know it’s extremely tempting to try and tackle the issue yourself. After all, it’s often time-consuming and expensive to seek out external expertise, but the thing is, seeking an expert can result in a more efficient outcome than spending exhausting hours in front of a keyboard while tasks begin to accumulate”, says Rod Aburto, Service Delivery Manager and Partner at Scio. “External expertise can be fantastic for getting to the bottom of difficult problems quickly and thoroughly, allowing you to get back into business as soon as possible. Plus, with specialized knowledge on your side, you can keep glaring security risks at bay. Ultimately, when it comes to technology, outside assistance can make all the difference in staying ahead of an IT crisis.

A partnership you can rely on

How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

Having a small IT department often means limited access to technical resources, which is a challenge when you want to roll out new projects or solve an IT crisis. And the best way to get around this is to bring Nearshore development support to the table. Nearshore developers can provide expertise on any project your team may not be able to handle, while still allowing you to maintain control of the project efficiently. And by having more knowledgeable people on board who have had experience rolling out similar projects, you can complete work faster and more cost-effectively without sacrificing quality. In the case of the US, a Nearshore company such as Scio, which has some of the best software developers in Latin America, offers close proximity (both culturally and geographically) to their partners, making communication easier and more efficient.

All in all, by partnering with a specialist, any IT department can efficiently eliminate many time-consuming tasks and have more energy to dedicate to other projects and initiatives within their organization. This shift in priorities allows them to focus on driving technological advances rather than simply running from one issue to the next. In short, choosing an outsourcing partner is a great way for IT leaders to create order from chaos and avoid the feeling of a day from hell in the process, or for small or mid-sized IT departments that want better results without upgrading their existing workforce.

Ultimately, when you’re in the midst of an IT crisis, finding the right external expertise can often make or break a resolution, and recruiting well-qualified Nearshore professionals will offer an invaluable response to pressing difficulties facing an organization. Investing in this extra support when your company hits the wall can be a lifesaver and put your organization lightyears ahead in alleviating any IT challenge and ensuring maximum productivity, which is an absolute must if you want to stay ahead of the curve in the digital world.

The Key Takeaways

  • In the IT world, it’s not especially difficult to have a “day from hell” thanks to the demands and responsibilities an IT professional juggles daily.
  • And for a small team, a huge project or a software crisis can be a lot more dangerous than expected, with quick responses as a must-have.
  • For these reasons, having the correct expertise in the field is extremely important, and a development partner is always the right answer.
  • In the case of Nearshore, which offers proximity and technical know-how, these crises can be easily tackled without sacrificing efficiency, or worrying about flexibility in the team.
The Value Of Team Flexibility During Challenging Times: Why Is Dynamic Staffing Better?

The Value Of Team Flexibility During Challenging Times: Why Is Dynamic Staffing Better?

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

Even if it looks otherwise, the software industry is not immune to the effects of recession cycles. During times when spending decreases and businesses become more cost-conscious, budgets for software development projects often suffer, having a significant impact on companies that rely on project-based revenue streams and their employees. And as we’ve seen so far in 2023, an unstable global economy has affected the Technology sector like never before, pushing software businesses today to navigate a very difficult situation where taking the necessary steps to shield themselves from the worst consequences of an economic downturn is critical. 

The Value Of Team Flexibility During Challenging Times: Why Is Dynamic Staffing Better?

Above all else, a very effective approach for software companies is to be agile and create systems and processes that enable them to adjust staff levels quickly when needed, focusing on minimizing disruption to any ongoing development project. After all, building a flexible team structure with both full-time and contract workers who can respond to current demands ensures that a company remains fully staffed, and resources remain able to be scaled up or down according to the current economic needs of the organization. And implementing effective training methods play an important role here too, guaranteeing that everyone is equipped with the necessary skills to bring a positive outcome for any project even if the team composition has changed. In other words, readiness is key when it comes to dealing with financial unpredictability and having a versatile workforce ready at all times is a big part of this success.

However, in tight budgets, companies often have to make tough choices, cutting back on staff and resources, making it difficult to build adequate teams with the right combination of skills. And if this situation continues for a long period, it can become increasingly tough for teams to maintain their momentum and stay on top of any new trends entering the market, with current staff members often having to take a bigger workload to fill in gaps that larger teams would otherwise occupy. It’s pretty likely that, during economic downturns, a lot of software organizations find themselves limited in the available talent they can hire. 

With this in mind, having the ability to scale the size of a software team can be an invaluable asset for any company. Such teams can come together quickly when needed, enabling companies to pivot and take on unique and complex projects that would otherwise be too difficult to tackle. At the same time, this approach allows developers to focus on specific tasks with laser-like precision, resulting in an improved project and output. So, during economically-uncertain times, the most successful software companies can decide about their ideal team size, as opposed to teams limited by what’s available at any given moment. But what is the best option to maintain flexibility in tough times? What choices are available?

Thinking outside the box

The Value Of Team Flexibility During Challenging Times: Why Is Dynamic Staffing Better?

In recent years, outsourcing software development has become increasingly popular thanks to the economic uncertainty that has prevailed since the start of the pandemic. Outsourcing allows organizations to take lesser risks, reduce operational costs and, more importantly, attain the necessary flexibility to scale staff up or down depending on the needs of a project, without the cost and commitment associated with hiring additional employees or establishing new departments in the company. Furthermore, it can be easier to forecast expenses when using an outside partner because project costs are fixed and known in advance, as long as a quality vendor is chosen. With companies now looking to stretch their budgets as much as possible to compete during every recession cycle, outsourcing provides an easy option for them to cut costs simply by working with external partners that specialize in the desired tasks. 

However, not all types of outsourcing are equal; the specific service must be tailored to match the individual circumstances of a company. Offshore outsourcing, for example, can offer low-cost highly-skilled coding, but working with remote locations (often in different continents) imposes delays, language barriers, and different cultural expectations that can lead to negative outcomes. On the other hand, more localized models such as freelancing might provide heightened responsiveness at somewhat higher rates but with less potential to scale up quickly which, as we already mentioned, is of utmost importance during a recession. 

This is where a Nearshore partnership model comes in. By partnering with a Nearshore such as Scio, software companies can benefit from an increased resource pool compared to employing an onsite team, providing additional strategic advantages. Things like access to skilled developers and IT engineers, expanded working hours due to the similar time zones, as well as the excellent user experience achieved by having a more diverse staff are some examples of advantages that companies can get to maintain their competitive edge in difficult economic times, thus allowing them to succeed despite the challenging environment. This is especially true when it comes to the aforementioned flexibility needed to keep the momentum of a project with very specific requirements.

The core benefit of working with a Nearshore partner, in short, is that team size can be dynamically adjusted to fit the specific needs of any project, which eliminates the problem of needing to find and build larger than necessary teams in-house. This means far less time wasted on locating and planning hiring cycles due to sudden additions or deletions from a team, and the ability to rapidly expand or contract their workforce without incurring the traditional drawbacks that come with making similar adjustments. And the ease of access to overseas markets, coupled with localized teams, means businesses can quickly scale up or down without worrying about talent availability, high attrition rates due to tedious onboarding processes, and language barrier issues. With Nearshore teams available at short notice, companies no longer have to strain their resources trying to keep track of volatile demands, enabling organizations to be better equipped to take full advantage of their resource expenditure.

But what if team flexibility is not enough?

The Value Of Team Flexibility During Challenging Times: Why Is Dynamic Staffing Better?

In an economic cycle of growth and recession, Technology companies must do their part to protect themselves, and one of the biggest challenges is staying on top of trends, as consumer needs in the software industry are constantly changing and evolving. Adopting or developing new products or services that can help grow their business during both times of growth and recession should play into their strategic planning, of course, and companies should be open to making changes in their business practices, automating redundant processes and streamlining tasks where possible, making adjustments to their product lines if those become over-saturated or if more cost-effective alternatives are available. 

And embracing new technologies should never be out of the question, especially with a trustworthy Nearshore partner at your side, which could help increase productivity by taking care of development and training staff on the relevant skills you need. Identifying innovative new ideas for existing services can also help generate new sources of revenue and put the company in a better position when the economy recovers. Staying diversified by offering services across multiple industries can provide stability even in times of economic uncertainty. Lastly, maintaining strong communication with customers allows you to anticipate their needs and prepare for whatever economic situation may arise while also building consumer loyalty which is beneficial both during times of growth and recession.

In short, the world economy is often subject to unforeseen changes, from threats of recession to pandemics. Software organizations must be prepared when unpredictable times arise, no matter how much the market fluctuates. Taking every precaution possible when anticipating economic hardship ensures that a business or organization can weather any storm, making changes as necessary, such as adopting a more flexible approach to staffing, to stay up-to-date on industry trends. Preparation leads to success, so software development organizations must take every precaution possible if faced with an economically trying year to remain strong during the entire season.

The Key Takeaways

  • Historically speaking, the tech industry has remained strong in the face of recessions, but that might not be true anymore in 2023.
  • To weather these economically-uncertain times, one of the key approaches is having flexibility in your staff, enabling you to increase or decrease team sizes as the situation demands.
  • To this end, partnering with a Nearshore company, instead of building on-site teams, is the best approach to accomplish this, enabling a company to access talent as a project and the economy permits.
  • However, secondary plans, like having a long-term strategy, keeping on top of trends, and being smart about your development partners, might also help to armor a software organization against any economic downturn. 
How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

When it comes to great software projects, the number of developers involved is incredibly important. Too few developers will lead to an insufficient amount of work being accomplished in a given timeframe, leading to delays or a rushed-feeling product at the end, whereas too many developers can lead to an over-complication of the project and end up costing a lot more than necessary. Therefore, it’s critical to carefully consider how much talent is needed for any project, but finding the ideal number of developers may be challenging for a small IT department that might not have access to all the resources necessary to make it happen.

How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

After all, IT departments that traditionally don’t do software can face a multitude of challenges when attempting to get an ambitious software project off the ground, and a major one is limited resources and personnel. Having not enough people on the team, for example, could result in a long project with a hit in quality due to the limited oversight that this development process can have, and the department size may limit their knowledge base and expertise, presenting a lot of difficulties when finding solutions to the issues that will arise along the way. And let’s not forget that finding adequate funding can be challenging if budgets are strict. Ultimately, a small IT department needs to be smart when dealing with these sorts of circumstances if they wish to be successful with their goals, and having an exact idea of how much talent will be needed to bring it to fruition is key.

Now, we understand that, for a small IT department, estimating the number of outside developers needed to start a project can be a tricky task, so the best first step is for the existing team to evaluate their own skills and capabilities before bringing in any external resources. Finding the right balance between what they can do themselves, and what they need experts to help with. The trick is to anticipate the technical challenges of a project early on, rather than waiting until there’s an issue that can’t be easily solved in-house. Also, it’s a good idea to have someone in the department with experience overseeing development from external parties, which will streamline both communication and collaboration when managing an external development team. The best way to approach Management to get the necessary support is by evaluating the size and complexity of the project, ensuring you understand its scope to come up with a good plan. That way you will have enough resources on board once you bring an external team on board. In the end, having an effective plan in place will give your small IT department greater peace of mind when it comes to resource and talent estimation.

Consider Nearshore

How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

If a small IT department finds itself in a situation where completing a software project is beyond its capability, hiring an external team is a wise decision. Not only will you benefit from having experienced developers specialized in the technology you need, but you’ll also have peace of mind knowing that your project is being handled by experienced professionals in completing tasks quickly, efficiently, and on budget. What’s more, getting outside help gives smaller teams access to world-class development approaches without having to staff up and purchase expensive software licenses themselves. That’s why outsourcing a project is almost always the course of action for many of these departments.

Small IT teams usually don’t have the manpower or financial capacity to tackle a large-scale project on top of their regular duties, and outsourcing can help them focus on what they do best and provides access to expertise that they might not have in-house. In theory, it also saves time; with an outside team just focusing on the job at hand, it usually takes far less time than an internal team managing everything from start to finish. However, there are some things to have in mind when it comes to outsourcing, so smart budgeting and research are always necessary.

Choosing the wrong partner, for example, can put an organization’s reputation and bottom line at risk, as shoddy programming jeopardizes timescales, data security, and overall cost-effectiveness. Additionally, there’s always a risk of communication breakdowns when dealing with an external team far away, due to various cultural or language barriers you usually find when outsourcing. It’s also important to remember that small departments often lack resources to independently evaluate and verify the quality of code being provided by external vendors to safeguard against substandard work or a cybercrime threat of any kind, and without a dedicated team to support any issues, it can be difficult for small-scale businesses to get necessary updates and troubleshoot problems as they come up. With all these in mind, it would be smart for any IT department considering outsourced software development to extensively research their potential partners before signing on the dotted line.

This is why collaborating with a Nearshore team is often the most sensible choice for a small IT department tasked with getting a big project off the ground. After all, if you have to find the right team and resources to handle the project, and ensure that those same resources make sense and adhere to time constraints, this is where nearshore collaboration shines. By bringing together teams from remote geographical locations within reasonable distances who have a mutual agreement in terms of language, political/legal systems, and time zones. Nearshore allows small IT departments to get global access to experienced talent that will fit any strategy you have in mind, which can be a huge boon for small IT departments looking for a quick and cost-efficient way of taking big projects forward.

Nearshore development is quickly becoming the most popular choice for businesses seeking assistance with software development without an internal team”, says Rod Aburto, Service Delivery Manager, and Partner, at Scio. Working with a nearshore partner not only allows businesses to tap into a whole new talent pool of high caliber, who can provide resources not otherwise available, but companies also benefit from working closely with people who bring cultural competency as well as insight into best practices and processes that could potentially streamline and improve their workflow. From faster problem resolution to minimizing communication issues, Nearshore development offers everything you need while saving on costs and providing peace of mind in knowing that tasks are getting done efficiently and effectively.

Getting the numbers right

How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

So now that you have a Nearshore partner that you trust, how many developers do you need to ask for to get the project started? There are a few baselines that are a good idea to follow, but every development cycle is unique, so you’ll need to discuss with your Nearshore partner flexibility options and their insight to be sure how many people will need to participate. According to this blog, it’s a good idea to start with a team of 3 to 4 developers and 3 to 4 IT specialists, divided into the following roles:

  • One full-time Project Manager
  • Two full-time developers 
  • One full-time backend developer 
  • One part-time UX/UI designer 
  • One part-time DevOps specialist 
  • One part-time QA engineer

In the context of Nearshore, “part-time” developers may simply mean people rotating between projects because their input happens at specific moments of the development cycle, so make sure to talk to your team to discuss all the details necessary to ensure you have the talent you need. Also, remember that this estimation is very basic; considering what kind of environments you will be developing for (desktop vs. mobile, Android vs. iOS), as well as your user base (purely internally used vs. a front-facing customer application) can change these numbers dramatically. Nevertheless, with enough staff flexibility, these issues don’t matter: what matters is starting a development journey that can be a turning point for any business harnessing the power of software and technology to make a change for themselves.

In the case of Scio, home to some of the best developers in Mexico and Latin America, the close cultural ties, its Agile philosophy, and the expertise it offers after two decades of collaboration with US-based companies that needed expertise, they could only find here, the Nearshore choice is always the best one. If you want the most seamless experience as the Head of a small IT department, then this is the opportunity for you. It’s time to make a change and begin a partnership that can only lead to success.

The Key Takeaways

  • Implementing new software solutions in business is always a good decision, but for a small IT department, it can present some serious challenges getting it off the ground.
  • If the department has constraints in terms of staff and budgeting, developing their own software can be a non-starter; the expertise and skills necessary might not be there.
  • Having a good plan is key to ensure any project can take off, and one of the main questions is the number of developers necessary to make an idea into reality.
  • Nearshore, for these reasons, might be the best option for an IT department, offering the flexibility necessary to work with all kinds of resources and objectives necessary to reach a positive outcome for everyone involved.