It can be quite challenging for web developers and designers to keep up with the continuous evolution of the web. Developers are expected to be ready to learn new programming languages and techniques. Web development generally has two areas: front-end and back-end development.
Not only do front-end development courses, skills, tools, goals, and functions differ from those required for back-end development, but there is also an overwhelming selection of web development tools to choose from. There are, however, developers who can work on both front-end and back-end development. They are known as full-stack developers.
Web development is a process that is never idle. It is done continuously because staying up-to-date with emerging developments is essential to business and many professional environments. The agile method is getting popular as adaptability and collaboration are becoming priorities.
In choosing the right web development tools, it would be prudent to consider the following factors: compatibility with your operating system, your platform, the complexity of the project, the ease of debugging and testing codes, the initial cost of developing, the cost of maintaining, online reviews and feedback, free prototypes, free evaluation, features of the tool, and the ease of navigation and user-friendliness of the tool.
AngularJS, developed by Google, is an open source framework. Although HTML is often used for declaring static documents in web applications, it fails at declaring dynamic views. AngularJS resolves this problem by letting you extend your HTML syntax, making it easier to develop and is more expressive than HTML alone. However, the downside is that using AngularJS results in non-separated codes. Some developers find this type of data-binding messy.
Like AngularJS, Aurelia extends the HTML syntax. The advantage of using Aurelia is that it has a model-view approach. This is a unique feature that no other app. The learning curve is also simple.
The downside of using Aurelia is that the app takes quite some time to load. The HTML file has first to be fetched from the server. The time it takes to load all the bundles depends on their size. Only after loading can the application be started.
The downside of using Ember is that tutorials available online are not updated. It may also be difficult to learn and the framework is too big for projects that aren’t that complex. Also, Ember is slow in catching up with developments. Updated versions are slow to come out.
Facebook developed ReactJS with the view of making building a dynamic user interface and making webpages more responsive to user input. It also makes webpages highly dynamic. ReactJS uses a virtual document object model (DOM), making updates quicker and building user interface more dynamic. It increases both performance and programming. It utilizes downward data binding, ensuring that changes do not affect parent structures.
The downside, some users observed, is that React technologies’ rapid evolution makes it hard to document. As a result, developers make the documentation themselves.
Like ReactJS, Vue.js also uses virtual DOM (Document Object Model). The appeal of Vue is its simplicity. It is easy to learn and use. It is also versatile as it can be used not only for simple apps but complex ones, too. The cons are that it lacks stable components, runtime errors are not descriptive, and that some plugins are in Chinese.
On the other hand, if you’re looking into back-end development, the following frameworks may prove useful:
Node.js is neither a framework nor a library; it is a runtime environment. In 2017, it gained popularity based on its user survey report. Node provides a lot of free tools. One of its benefits is the easy sharing of knowledge with the team. But like others, it has its drawbacks. Node heavily relies on callbacks, thus, keeping several tasks queued in the background. Because of this, the quality of the codes can be impaired. This is resolved through callbackhell.com.
Meteor.js is a full-stack development tool. The benefits of Meteor.js are its simplicity and real-time testing tools. It also provides seamless real-time communication between the client and the server. The downside is that Meteor does not have service side rendering. It also requires a stable internet connection in order not to impair front-end and back-end synchronization.
The success of the web developer’s process highly depends on choosing the right technology stack and web development tools. This process may be made less complicated by the help of full-stack web and software developer teams. Visit our website Scio for more information on how you can work with web development professionals and experts for your next project.