it - ScioDev

Senior Mobile App Developer (.NET MAUI)

Location: Must be based in Mexico or LatAm

We’re a dynamic team at one of the Best Places to Code companies based in Mexico. Our mission? To create fully-fledged platforms using a wide range of tools and technologies.

Keep reading if you’re passionate about clean, elegant code and love collaborating with experts!

We’re looking for a Senior Mobile Developer with hands-on experience building, maintaining, and deploying cross-platform mobile applications using .NET MAUI. If you’re passionate about delivering high-quality software, fluent in C#/.NET Core, and have successfully published apps to the Apple App Store and Google Play, we’d love to hear from you.

As a senior member of our development team, you’ll play a critical role in both developing new features and maintaining existing mobile applications built with .NET MAUI and Blazor. You’ll collaborate with backend developers, designers, and stakeholders to ensure the continued success and evolution of our mobile products.

Key Responsibilities:

Maintain, improve, and support existing mobile applications across mobile platforms, with a focus on Android.

Design and develop new features using .NET MAUI, Blazor, C#, and XAML.

Ensure performance, usability, and stability of the app through regular updates and refactoring.

Integrate with backend services and databases (RESTful APIs, SQL Server).

Manage app deployment and updates to the Apple App Store and Google Play Store.

Write clean, maintainable, and testable code that follows best practices and design patterns, such as MVVM and DI.

Troubleshoot production issues and implement long-term solutions.

Required Qualifications:

5+ years of professional experience in software development.

2+ years of experience building and maintaining mobile apps with .NET MAUI or Xamarin.Forms.

Demonstrated experience deploying apps to Google Play (private apps B2B).

Strong knowledge of C#, .NET Core, and SQL Server.

Experience with XAML-based UI development and MVVM architecture.

Proficient in integrating RESTful APIs and handling app lifecycle across platforms.

Familiarity with Git, CI/CD workflows, and Agile development practices.

The journey:

We know your time is valuable, so know the whole process will take about 2 weeks. There will be 4 interviews total (an initial one with Human Capital, a technical skill one, one with an Account Manager, and probably one with the client at the end), possibly with a technical test, if necessary.

We will keep you regularly updated about your application, but you can also get in touch with us to ask about its status or anything else you might want to know. Just have fun! If you are a good match for Scio, we will give you a formal job offer and ask you to get the pre-hiring requirements to us within 5 days at most, so preparedness is key.

How to Apply:

If this is the perfect fit for you, send your resume in English to humancapital@sciodev.com. We’ll keep you updated throughout the process.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need further details!

Why Planning Still Matters (Even If Plans Don’t)

Nearshore, Outsourced Engineering Team, Project Management, Successful Outsourcing

By: Adolfo Cruz

Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

Introduction: Plans Change. Planning Prepares You for It.

In software projects, unpredictability isn’t the exception — it’s the rule. Features change, team members shift, and priorities evolve. In the face of so much flux, the act of planning becomes essential.

While the plan itself might not survive contact with reality, the process of planning equips teams to navigate that reality with clarity and confidence. Let’s explore the modern approaches to estimating and planning that embrace uncertainty while helping teams move forward with purpose.

Planning Is Not a One-Time Event

Gone are the days of creating a project plan once and hoping for the best. Today’s planning is continuous. Teams revisit their plans frequently, adjusting based on progress, blockers, and new information.

Think of it like updating your route during a road trip. The destination may stay the same, but road closures, traffic, or weather might send you on a better path.

Approaches like rolling wave planning and frequent reforecasting let teams adapt with agility while keeping everyone aligned.

Estimation Techniques That Work Today

Modern estimation balances experience with data. Here are some techniques teams are using effectively:

Three-point estimation: Consider best-case, worst-case, and most likely scenarios.

Parametric estimation: Use historical data and formulas (e.g., ‘5 hours per user story’).

Analogous estimation: Reference similar past projects to gauge effort.

Monte Carlo simulation: Model delivery outcomes based on variability.

No-estimates forecasting: Skip the guesswork and rely on actual throughput trends.

Whether you’re sizing new work or forecasting a release, the goal is to use estimation to set realistic expectations, not false certainty.

Hybrid Models Are the New Normal

Most teams aren’t strictly Agile or strictly traditional anymore. They mix methods to fit their environment. You might sprint through development while following a Waterfall-style approval process. Or plan quarterly outcomes with room for Agile experimentation.

These hybrid models provide the best of both worlds: flexibility for the team and structure for the stakeholders. It’s not about following a playbook—it’s about picking the right tools for the job.

Better Metrics Mean Smarter Planning

Story points and velocity still exist, but modern teams are expanding their toolkit. Metrics like cycle time, throughput, lead time, and flow efficiency offer deeper insights into how work really moves.

With these measures, you can spot bottlenecks, manage expectations, and forecast more accurately. Planning becomes less about guesswork and more about understanding your system.

The Real Value of Planning

So, why plan at all? Because planning brings clarity. It aligns teams, surfaces risks, and sparks conversations that might not happen otherwise.

Planning isn’t a rigid document — it’s a shared moment of focus. It helps everyone step back, look ahead, and move forward together.

Whether it’s in a sprint planning session, a roadmap review, or a collaborative estimation meeting, good planning invites better decisions and stronger teamwork.

Planning in the Age of AI

AI isn’t replacing planning — it’s making it smarter. Today’s tools can forecast delivery timelines, identify risks, and adjust plans based on real-time data.

From Jira Advanced Roadmaps to tools like ClickUp AI and Microsoft Copilot, teams can now plan faster and with more confidence. The human touch is still essential — but it’s now supported by powerful insights.

Final Thoughts

Plans may go off course. That’s not a failure — that’s reality. But planning equips you to respond with purpose and clarity.

Modern estimating and planning aren’t about rigid control. They’re about creating shared understanding, enabling flexibility, and building momentum — even in uncertain times.

And in a world that rarely goes according to plan, that might be the most valuable tool of all.

bairesdev software outsourcing, wiseline software development, itijuana nearshore development, alternatives to bairesdev, better than wiseline, bairesdev vs sciodev, wiseline vs sciodev, itijuana vs sciodev, nearshore development companies comparison, top nearshore software companies, nearshore software development benefits, outsourcing software development to Mexico, why nearshoring works, what is nearshore outsourcing, nearshore vs offshore software development, nearshore software engineers in Latin America, agile nearshore development, challenges of nearshore outsourcing, how to choose a nearshore partner, nearshore IT outsourcing guide, hire nearshore software developers, scalable nearshore dev team, nearshore development Mexico, nearshore agile product team, custom software development Mexico, dedicated software team Latin America, remote development team Mexico, top software developers Mexico, enterprise software development nearshore, software engineering outsourcing Latin America, reduce development costs with nearshore, overcome developer shortage US, how to scale your dev team fast, managing remote development teams, remote collaboration best practices, nearshore team communication, software outsourcing without the headaches, how to avoid outsourcing mistakes, hiring senior developers nearshore, stable software development teams, build operate transfer software team, long-term software development partner, nearshore software partner not vendor, performance management for developers, culturally aligned software team, easy-to-work-with dev teams, team augmentation nearshore, staff augmentation Mexico, software development retention strategy, software delivery team integration

Adolfo Cruz

PMO Director

The Hidden Cost of Technical Debt

Nearshore, Product Development, Software Development

By Denisse Morelos

Why “If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It” Can Be a Costly Mistake in 2025

What Is Technical Debt—and Why It’s a Growing Risk for U.S. Tech Companies

Technical debt refers to the hidden cost of choosing a faster, easier software solution today instead of a better long-term one. This trade-off accumulates quietly—until it slows everything down.

Common causes include:

Rushed releases due to pressure from stakeholders
Lack of documentation
Legacy code no one wants to touch
Poor architectural choices made years ago

What is technical debt? → «It’s the engineering equivalent of cutting corners now and paying more later—through bugs, delays, and developer frustration.»

Engineer analyzing technical warnings on screen

The Fallacy of “If It Ain’t Broke” in Software Development

That old saying doesn’t apply to modern codebases.
Code that “ain’t broke” might still be a liability:

Onboarding takes weeks
Small bugs cause big outages
Releases get delayed by last-minute surprises
Devs hesitate to touch “certain” parts of the code
Your team is stuck fixing, not building

According to McKinsey, technical debt can increase software maintenance costs by up to 60% and stall digital transformation.

What Technical Debt Actually Costs Your Business

Even if it doesn’t show up in a financial statement, technical debt has a measurable impact:

Impact Area	Hidden Cost
Developer Efficiency	30–40% of time spent on unblocking legacy code
QA Stability	Bugs, regressions, and missed release cycles
Innovation	Inability to adopt new tools or frameworks
Talent Retention	Developer frustration, burnout, and churn

Stripe’s Developer Coefficient (2023): Developers spend up to 33% of their time handling tech debt.

5 Signs You’re Already Paying for Technical Debt

Not sure if technical debt is hurting you? Watch for these:

Onboarding takes weeks
Small bugs cause big outages
Releases get delayed by last-minute surprises
Devs hesitate to touch “certain” parts of the code
Your team is stuck fixing, not building

If this sounds familiar, you’re already paying the price.

Types of Technical Debt

Not all technical debt is created equal. Understanding the different types helps in prioritizing what to address and when.

Intentional vs. Unintentional Debt

Intentional debt happens when teams knowingly delay a better solution due to time or resource constraints, with plans to fix it later.
Unintentional debt arises when developers make decisions without realizing the long-term consequences, often due to inexperience or lack of information.

Short-Term vs. Long-Term Debt

Short-term debt can be acceptable if managed (e.g., quick fixes before a major release).
Long-term or architectural debt is more dangerous—affecting scalability, integration, and system evolution.

Real-World Examples of Technical Debt Types

Intentional Debt Example:

A product team skips writing unit tests to meet a feature deadline. The team documents this decision and schedules a follow-up sprint to add coverage.

Unintentional Debt Example:

An engineer unfamiliar with a legacy system adds a new feature without understanding existing dependencies, introducing regression risks.

Architectural Debt Example:

An application built as a monolith five years ago struggles to scale with new microservices, delaying time-to-market for new modules.

Business Impact: Real or Simulated Cases

Let’s consider two hypothetical but common scenarios:

Scenario A – Fast-Growing Startup:

A SaaS startup rushes to market. Developers hardcode configurations, skip documentation, and reuse outdated libraries.
Result: Two years later, onboarding new hires takes weeks, bugs are frequent, and scaling requires a costly rebuild.

Scenario B – Enterprise Legacy Platform:

An established company keeps patching an old monolith system to avoid investment in modernization.
Result: Innovation stalls. Integrating with new tools becomes impossible, and top engineers leave for more modern stacks.

Whether you’re a startup or an enterprise, technical debt limits agility—and with it, your competitive edge.

How to Measure Technical Debt

You can’t improve what you can’t measure. Here are ways to identify and quantify technical debt:

Code Quality Tools: Platforms like SonarQube, CodeClimate, and Maintainability Index offer objective scores.

Development KPIs: Track metrics such as:

Average time to resolve bugs
Time spent maintaining legacy code vs. building new features
Frequency of hotfixes or regressions

Technical Debt Ratio (TDR):
This KPI estimates the effort needed to fix the codebase relative to building it from scratch. A ratio above 5% signals urgent action.

Why CTOs Don’t Prioritize It (and Why They Should)

Despite the risks, many CTOs underinvest in tech debt reduction. Why?

Misaligned incentives: Engineering is rewarded for shipping fast, not refactoring.
Lack of visibility: Business leaders don’t “see” the debt—until outages happen.
Fear of disruption: Teams avoid touching fragile codebases, fearing ripple effects.

But here’s the reality: companies that ignore tech debt are playing defense.
Those who address it proactively get:

Faster release cycles
Easier onboarding and team scaling
Freedom to innovate with new tech

Why U.S. Tech Leaders Are Choosing Nearshore Teams to Handle Technical Debt

Technical debt is not just a technical problem—it’s a growth problem.

Companies in tech hubs like Austin, San Francisco, and Miami are turning to nearshore software development partners in Mexico for help.

Why?

Nearshore teams in Mexico offer real-time collaboration
Developers are culturally aligned with U.S. work styles
Reduced time-to-onboard compared to offshore vendors
Higher retention and engagement on long-term projects

At Scio, our software developers partner directly with your team to audit, refactor, and document debt-heavy systems—so you can innovate again.

Developer overwhelmed by legacy system complexity

FAQs About Technical Debt and Nearshore Teams

Q: How do I know if technical debt is hurting my business?A: If your team spends more time fixing than building, onboarding takes weeks, or small changes cause unexpected bugs—you’re already feeling the impact.

Q: Can nearshore teams really help with legacy systems?
A: Yes. Scio’s developers are experienced in working with outdated codebases and gradually refactoring while ensuring ongoing delivery.

Q: How long does it take to reduce technical debt?
A: It depends on the size and type of debt. We typically start with a 2–4 week audit phase and outline a roadmap with clear priorities.

Q: What’s the first step to get started with Scio?
A: Contact us through sciodev.com. We’ll schedule a short consultation to understand your systems and challenges.

Why Scio Is a Strategic Nearshore Partner for Managing Technical Debt

Not all nearshore vendors are created equal. At Scio, we focus on more than just filling seats—we integrate into your product culture.

Here’s what makes us different:

Strategic Onboarding: We don’t drop devs into your stack. We learn your business, your codebase, and your goals.
Agile Fluency: All our engineers are trained in Scrum and Agile practices. We adapt to your rituals and sprints.
High Retention, Low Overhead: Our developers stay with you long-term—reducing ramp-up costs and tribal knowledge loss.
Real-Time Collaboration: Operating from Mexico, our teams work in your timezone, attend your standups, and resolve blockers in real time.

Working with Scio means choosing a partner who helps you build, clean up, and scale—without sacrificing velocity.

Supporting Insights and Industry Data

Stripe Developer Coefficient (2023): Developers spend up to 33% of their time addressing technical debt.
McKinsey & Company: Poor software quality (often caused by legacy code and tech debt) increases maintenance costs by up to 60%.
Gartner (2024): Companies that proactively manage technical debt improve delivery speed by 25% on average.
JetBrains Developer Ecosystem Report: 59% of developers report frustration working with poorly documented or legacy code.

Summary: Don’t Let Technical Debt Stall Your Growth

Technical debt slows down innovation, frustrates devs, and costs more than it seems.
It’s more than a tech issue—it’s a business issue.
Measuring it, prioritizing it, and acting with a strategy is key to modernizing.
Scio’s nearshore teams offer a unique advantage: trust, alignment, and experience with legacy systems.

💡 Ready to address your technical debt?
Let’s talk about how Scio can help you clean it up without disrupting your roadmap.

👉 Visit sciodev.com or message us to book a consultation.

Database Engineer

Job Offer

We’re a dynamic team at one of the Best Places to Code companies based in Mexico. Our mission? To create fully-fledged platforms using a wide range of tools and technologies.

Keep reading if you’re passionate about clean, elegant code and love collaborating with experts!

Location: Must be based in Mexico or LatAm