Adapting to the Future: Flexibility in Tech Isn’t Optional Anymore 

Adapting to the Future: Flexibility in Tech Isn’t Optional Anymore 

By Helena Matamoros, Human Capital Manager at Scio
Top view of a person holding a black clock next to a blank notebook and laptop—symbolizing hybrid work, time autonomy, and modern work flexibility.
As someone who’s spent the last few years helping tech teams thrive at Scio, I’ve witnessed a dramatic shift in how we define “work.” Today, flexibility is no longer a perk; it’s a strategic foundation, especially for companies building nearshore teams or expanding globally.

Hybrid Work Is the New Normal

At Scio, we embraced the hybrid work model early not as a temporary fix, but as a long-term evolution. By allowing team members to choose the environment where they perform best, we’ve not only improved work-life balance but also unlocked new levels of performance and creativity.

For tech companies anywhere in the U.S. looking to build high-performing teams in Latin America, flexibility is key to attracting and retaining top talent.
A man participating in a video call with a distributed remote team—symbolizing trust, autonomy, and communication in hybrid work.

Beyond Remote: Flexibility Means Trust

It’s not just about location. True flexibility is built on trust, autonomy, and outcome-based leadership. We’ve invested in tools for asynchronous collaboration and immersive communication to support a distributed workforce across LATAM.

The result? Teams that feel connected, regardless of time zone. People who are empowered, engaged, and motivated to do their best work.

A More Inclusive Way to Lead

Shifting to flexible work requires a new mindset. One that prioritizes inclusion, psychological safety, and leadership that listens. For us at Scio, that’s meant helping our clients build teams, not just fill roles.

Because when every voice is heard, whether from Monterrey, Mexico City, or right here in Texas, innovation accelerates.

Why It Matters for Nearshore Growth

For U.S. companies looking to scale through nearshoring, flexibility isn’t optional, it’s your competitive edge. Hiring beyond borders means designing workplaces that work across cultures and contexts.

And that’s what we do at Scio:
We help companies build strategic nearshore software teams that are trusted, bilingual, aligned, and easy to work with.
A diverse group of hands connecting colorful gears—symbolizing collaboration, unity, and the collective future of hybrid work.

Let’s Keep the Conversation Going

If you’re navigating this shift in your own organization, whether you’re in HR or leading tech teams; I’d love to hear from you. What has flexibility looked like for your company? What challenges have you faced?

Let’s connect and shape the future of work together.

Suggested Reading

Helena Matamoros

Helena Matamoros

Human Capital Manager

Why Legal & IP Risks Are Higher in Offshore Contracts (And What to Do About It) 

Why Legal & IP Risks Are Higher in Offshore Contracts (And What to Do About It) 

Written by: Monserrat Raya 

Golden justice scale over a global map, illustrating legal and IP risks in offshore software development contracts.
Offshore outsourcing has become a popular strategy for scaling software development teams quickly and cost-effectively. It promises access to global talent at reduced costs—but these benefits often come with hidden legal and intellectual property (IP) risks that can threaten a company’s long-term competitiveness. This is especially true for U.S. companies engaging vendors in regions like India, Ukraine, or the Philippines, where legal systems, IP norms, and enforcement capabilities can diverge significantly from those in the United States. If you’re a legal stakeholder, procurement leader, or CTO, understanding these risks—and knowing how to mitigate them—is critical. That’s where a nearshore partner like Scio offers a more secure, compliant, and collaborative model for outsourcing.

What Are the Legal and IP Risks in Offshore Software Contracts?

When evaluating offshore development options, many decision-makers focus primarily on budget. However, legal and compliance risks can generate much higher long-term costs.

Here are the most common legal issues businesses face with offshore contracts:

  • Weak enforceability of contracts, especially when disputes are subject to foreign jurisdictions with slow or unreliable judicial systems.
  • Limited intellectual property protection, as highlighted by the U.S. Trade Representative’s Special 301 Report, which places several outsourcing hubs on its watch list for IP rights violations.
  • Poor alignment with global privacy regulations, such as the EU’s GDPR or California’s CCPA, creating legal exposure in how data is handled or transferred.
  • Ambiguity in subcontractor relationships, which can lead to sensitive source code or data being shared with unknown third parties.
  • Language and cultural differences that obscure contract intent and IP expectations.

    Offshore outsourcing legal concerns may not surface immediately—but they often appear once IP ownership is contested or product liability arises.

    For a broader understanding of the most common risks, read our article on 10 Risks of Offshore Outsourcing.

    Secure cloud outsourcing illustration with a padlock, symbolizing IP protection risks in offshore software contracts.

    How Can I Protect My IP in Offshore Development Contracts?

    IP protection in outsourcing requires a proactive approach. According to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), IP disputes across jurisdictions are costly and slow, and often, enforcement is inconsistent due to legal fragmentation.

    To safeguard your IP when outsourcing, consider these legal safeguards:

    U.S. or USMCA Jurisdiction Clauses

    Specify that all legal matters be governed by U.S. or North American law, and that disputes be settled in a U.S. court or through arbitration under a recognized international body like the ICC or AAA.

    Clear Source Code Ownership Terms

    Define that all deliverables, including source code, documentation, and proprietary algorithms, are considered “work for hire” and owned by your company upon creation.

    Escrow Arrangements

    Consider placing source code in escrow in case the vendor fails to deliver or becomes non-compliant.

    Strong NDAs and Non-Compete Clauses

    These must be enforceable both in the vendor’s home country and in the U.S., which often means dual-language contracts and jurisdiction bridging.

    Direct Employment of Developers

    Avoid teams composed of loosely managed freelancers or subcontractors who fall outside of enforceable agreements.

    These practices are core to Scio’s approach, ensuring full legal transparency and developer accountability.

    Are NDAs Enforceable with Offshore Partners?

    Short answer: Not always.

    NDAs (Non-Disclosure Agreements) are a standard tool for protecting proprietary information. But in many offshore outsourcing regions, their enforceability is limited.

    • In countries like India, Vietnam, or Eastern European nations, local courts may not recognize or prioritize foreign NDAs.
    • Language barriers can create misinterpretation of contract terms, reducing their legal strength.
    • Some jurisdictions lack a legal concept of “trade secret” comparable to U.S. law, making enforcement practically difficult.

    The American Bar Association notes that companies outsourcing overseas should assume that NDAs are only as strong as the jurisdictional clarity and enforcement mechanisms in place.

    For companies exploring Agile models of collaboration, pairing solid legal frameworks with iterative delivery can reduce ambiguity. Learn more in our article: Benefits of Agile Development.

    Legal Red Flags Table: Offshore Contracts vs. Nearshoring with Scio

    Legal Area
    Offshore (India, Eastern Europe)
    Nearshore with Scio (Mexico)
    Enforceability of NDAs Low to Moderate High (U.S.-aligned under USMCA)
    IP Ownership Clarity Frequently ambiguous Clear and codified in contract
    Jurisdiction & Litigation Requires foreign arbitration NAFTA/USMCA-aligned jurisdiction
    Data Privacy Regulations Fragmented and inconsistent GDPR, CCPA, and USMCA-aware
    Legal Language Barriers High Low – bilingual legal and technical teams
    Cultural Understanding of IP Limited Strong U.S. tech sector alignment
    Compared to Offshore Regions Like India or Eastern Europe, Nearshoring to Mexico with Scio Ensures:
    • Legal proximity under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which modernized IP protection standards across North America.
    • Aligned time zones and faster communication, reducing operational and legal delays.
    • Stronger employee contracts, without hidden subcontracting chains.
    • Bilingual legal support, ensuring that all documents are legally accurate in both Spanish and English.
    • Scio builds teams with legal clarity in mind—your developers are full-time, documented, and bound by enforceable agreements aligned with your jurisdiction.
    Businessperson reviewing legal documents on a digital tablet with cybersecurity icons, symbolizing IP risks and cross-border compliance challenges.

    Why These Risks Are Higher in Traditional Offshore Models

    1. Jurisdictional Complexity

    Outsourcing contracts often fall under the vendor’s local legal system, where:

    • IP rights may not be prioritized
    • Legal recourse is costly and slow
    • Local bias may affect dispute resolution

    In some cases, U.S. companies have spent years in arbitration with little to no restitution.
    If you’re dealing with legacy systems or aging vendor relationships, this problem can get worse over time. Read more on how inertia in outsourcing decisions can create hidden costs in Why “If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It” Can Be a Costly Mistake in 2025.

    2. IP Theft and Code Leakage

    According to the U.S. Intellectual Property Commission, IP theft costs U.S. businesses over $600 billion annually, and a large portion comes from technology and software leaks. Offshore vendors with weak internal controls may:

    • Re-use your code for other clients
    • Employ shadow developers not bound by NDA
    • Expose sensitive assets to foreign state actors

    These risks are especially critical for SaaS companies and digital product businesses. For a more detailed breakdown, visit our blog on Building a SaaS Application: Pros and Cons.

    3. Data Privacy & Cross-Border Transfer

    Hosting or transferring data to foreign jurisdictions without proper compliance can lead to major regulatory fines. For example:

    • The GDPR imposes penalties up to €20 million or 4% of global revenue.
    • The CCPA allows for class-action lawsuits in cases of data breaches.

    By contrast, nearshoring with Scio ensures all data operations remain compliant within USMCA data protection standards.

    Legal Checklist Before Signing an Offshore or Nearshore Contract

    Legal Item
    Offshore Vendor
    Scio (Nearshore)
    IP Ownership clearly defined?
    Often vague

    Explicit
    NDA Enforceability confirmed?
    Uncertain

    Confirmed in MX & U.S.
    Jurisdiction set to U.S./USMCA law?
    No

    Yes
    Subcontractors disclosed?
    Rarely

    No subcontractors
    Legal documents in English?
    Translated

    Native English & Spanish
    Local legal support available?
    Not easily

    Yes (U.S. + MX counsel)

    Conclusion: Nearshoring with Scio = Legal Confidence

    While offshore vendors may promise lower hourly rates, the long-term legal costs and risks—from IP disputes to data breaches—can be financially devastating. Scio offers a better way:
    • U.S.-compliant legal structures
    • Culturally aligned, full-time engineering teams
    • Transparent contracts and operational control
    Contact Scio today to learn how we build high-performing, low-risk software teams that respect your IP, your legal framework, and your business goals.

    FAQs

    How do I ensure my software IP is protected overseas?
    Work with providers like Scio that operate under the USMCA framework and offer contracts enforceable in North America.
    What’s the biggest legal risk in offshore software outsourcing?
    Unenforceable IP clauses and vague ownership agreements—especially when governed by foreign law.
    Is nearshoring really safer than offshore outsourcing?
    Yes. Nearshore partners in Mexico, like Scio, offer jurisdictional alignment, cultural compatibility, and more effective legal recourse.
    Why does offshore outsourcing fail legally?
    Because legal systems abroad are often misaligned with U.S. standards, making enforcement of contracts, NDAs, and IP rights difficult and slow.
    How to Build Culturally Aligned Nearshore Teams That Actually Work 

    How to Build Culturally Aligned Nearshore Teams That Actually Work 

    Written by: Denisse Morelos

    Diverse nearshore team collaborating and smiling around a shared task, symbolizing cultural alignment.

    Introduction

    For U.S.-based tech companies, building distributed software teams has become a strategic move. Nearshoring to Latin America—especially Mexico—offers not only proximity and time zone overlap, but access to strong engineering talent. However, a nearshore team’s success goes far beyond logistics. What really makes the difference is cultural alignment.

    This article walks you through what cultural alignment looks like in practice, how it impacts your ROI, and how Scio’s nearshore engineering framework—shaped through years of collaboration—can help build teams that truly deliver. For a deeper dive, see The Long-Term Benefits of Cultural Alignment in Team Augmentation.

    Why Cultural Alignment Matters in Nearshore Software Teams

    It’s More Than Just Time Zone Compatibility

    Sure, time zone overlap makes real-time collaboration easier. But shared hours mean little if the team isn’t aligned on communication norms, expectations, or decision-making styles. Misalignment in these areas can lead to friction, slowed delivery, and repeated work.

    Imagine this: your U.S.-based team gives fast, blunt feedback. Your nearshore team interprets it as negative or disrespectful. Now you have a cultural issue—one that no project management tool can fix.

    The Hidden Costs of Cultural Misalignment

    When cultural alignment is missing, we’ve seen it show up in:

    • Slower onboarding and unclear expectations
    • Repeated corrections due to misunderstandings
    • Low morale and high turnover from feeling out of sync
    • Project delays and declining trust between teams

    These hidden costs can quietly erode productivity, delivery quality, and team engagement—three areas that matter deeply to any CTO.

    For more insight, explore Overcoming Challenges in Nearshore Development: Tips for Seamless Collaboration and Harvard Business Review’s guide on Harvard Business Review’s guide on Managing Multicultural Teams.

    Infographic representing shared work values and cultural alignment in nearshore teams.

    Key Elements of Cultural Alignment

    Shared Work Values and Expectations

    In our experience, high-performing nearshore teams don’t just follow tasks—they share core values like ownership, curiosity, adaptability, and proactive problem-solving. When engineers are aligned with your company’s mindset, we’ve seen productivity and retention improve dramatically.

    That’s why we prioritize both technical expertise and cultural compatibility during our recruitment process—drawing from what’s worked in building distributed teams across industries. If you’re looking for guidance, check out How to Evaluate Cultural Compatibility When Hiring Nearshore Teams.

    Communication Norms and Language Nuance

    Even fluent English speakers interpret tone, formality, and feedback differently. A U.S. team might say “this needs to be better,” expecting iteration. A Latin American engineer might hear that as a sign of failure.

    Rather than expecting teams to adjust on their own, we’ve developed intercultural coaching practices to help both sides bridge these differences effectively—resulting in clearer, more respectful communication.

    Team Rituals That Build Trust

    Culture isn’t something you download—it’s built day by day. In our work with nearshore teams, we’ve seen that stand-ups, demos, retrospectives, informal chats, and celebrating wins together (even virtually) all contribute to creating a sense of unity.

    These shared rituals help establish psychological safety, allowing distributed teams to operate as one.

    Best Practices to Build Culturally Aligned Teams

    Hiring for Soft Skills and Cultural Fit

    At Scio, our mission goes beyond simply outsourcing developers—we partner with you to build cohesive, committed teams.

    With our ScioElevate system, we’ve refined a process to identify candidates who bring not only strong technical skills, but also the emotional intelligence, openness to feedback, and cultural curiosity that distributed collaboration demands. These soft skills are often what make or break success in global teams.

    If you’re building remote teams, we recommend reading Remote Work: Soft Skills for a Successful Team.

    Onboarding That Goes Beyond the Tech Stack

    We’ve learned that great onboarding isn’t just about access to Jira or Slack—it’s about creating alignment from day one.

    That’s why we’ve co-designed a structured onboarding experience, shaped by years of client collaboration, that includes:

    • Tools and workflow orientation
    • Communication expectations and feedback norms

    This human-centered approach accelerates integration and builds trust early on.

    Continuous Feedback Loops and Retrospectives

    Over time, we’ve found that strong distributed teams develop shared rhythms for feedback. Weekly 1:1s, retros, and informal check-ins create space for continuous improvement and early issue detection.

    Together with our partners, we’ve fostered a feedback culture that emphasizes growth over criticism—something that’s proven essential in maintaining engagement and reducing turnover.

    For more on agile practices in remote teams, read Best Practices for Distributed Agile – Part 4 of 5.

    Hands stacking communication icons on blocks to represent async and sync collaboration strategies.

    How Scio Builds Teams That Actually Work

    We believe that scaling a software team should never come at the cost of communication, continuity, or quality.

    That belief led us to create ScioElevate—our internal talent development and performance framework—shaped from years of working closely with nearshore engineers and global product teams.

    To learn how our internal culture supports this, read “Collaboration is at the heart of everything we do here”.

    Additional Benefits of Nearshoring to Mexico

    Beyond cultural alignment, Mexico offers compelling advantages for U.S. companies looking to scale:

    • Large tech talent pool: Over 700,000 professionals in IT and engineering roles.
    • Time zone overlap: Real-time collaboration across U.S. time zones.
    • Business-friendly regulations: Favorable IP laws and trade agreements under USMCA.
    • Cost-effectiveness: High-quality talent at competitive rates compared to U.S. or Eastern Europe.

    These advantages make Mexico a strategic choice for building high-impact software teams.

    Puzzle piece with a question mark symbolizing frequently asked questions about nearshore cultural alignment.

    Frequently Asked Questions About Nearshore Cultural Alignment

    What is cultural alignment in nearshore teams?

    Cultural alignment refers to shared expectations around communication, decision-making, feedback, and work styles. It helps remote teams function as a unified group, rather than just outsourced contributors.

    How do I evaluate cultural compatibility when hiring?

    Go beyond the résumé. Use behavioral interviews to assess curiosity, adaptability, and communication style. Present candidates with real scenarios to see how they handle feedback or collaborate across teams.

    Why is nearshoring to Mexico so effective?

    Mexico offers a strong pool of engineering talent, works in overlapping time zones with the U.S., and shares many cultural traits that allow faster and smoother integration compared to other outsourcing regions.

    Can I build a high-performance team remotely?

    Absolutely. Success depends more on people, mindset, and alignment than on tools alone. With the right framework, distributed teams can equal—or even outperform—co-located ones.

    Final Thoughts: Cultural Fit Is a Strategic Advantage

    When your team is aligned, work flows. Onboarding speeds up. Communication improves. Engagement grows. You build not just software—but momentum.

    If you’re ready to stop outsourcing and start building a real team, we’re here to support you. Together, we can tap into Mexico’s top engineering talent and co-create the cultural bridge that makes nearshoring actually work.

    2025 Brings New Challenges for Women in Tech—But We’re Still Going Strong 

    2025 Brings New Challenges for Women in Tech—But We’re Still Going Strong 

    Written by Yamila Solari – 

    2025 Brings New Challenges for Women in Tech—But We’re Still Going Strong

    This Women’s Day 2025 got me thinking about the new challenges women everywhere are facing—especially in tech. In recent years, many organizations have highlighted Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) as a key part of their talent strategies. But politics and economic pressures have led to cuts and changes, threatening the progress we’ve made. Despite all this, women in tech are continuing to move forward, carving out new paths—not just for themselves, but for the whole industry.

    DEI Under Pressure

    Right now, equity is a hot-button issue. Some companies that once openly supported DEI are quietly scaling back or renaming their initiatives. Sure, some of that is about saving money amid all the layoffs in tech, but it also reflects a broader debate about whether these programs should even exist. Women, already a minority in tech, definitely feel the impact when DEI support starts to shrink.

    A big example is Women Who Code (WWC), a global nonprofit that served 360,000 members across 145 countries. It shut down last year because it couldn’t secure enough funding. WWC wasn’t just a conference organizer—it offered scholarships, networking, and skill-building for countless women. So its closure makes you wonder: if such a big DEI-focused group can’t stay afloat, what happens to early-career women who need guidance, mentorship, and a supportive community?

    Why DEI Still Matters

    Despite the setbacks, there’s plenty of data showing that diverse teams perform better and can boost a company’s bottom line. When you have women in leadership—especially in tech—you benefit from a wider range of perspectives and more effective problem-solving approaches. This is critical for things like AI, cybersecurity, and generally staying innovative.

    Unfortunately, underrepresentation of women is still the norm. And it’s not just in the U.S. In Mexico, where most of our engineers live, a study by the Center for Economic and Budgetary Research (CIEP) found that women make up only around 15.5% of the IT workforce, with 93.8% of them working specifically as software developers. That’s just one example of how women face added barriers worldwide—barriers made worse by DEI cutbacks and layoffs targeting diversity professionals.

    The Bigger Backlash

    On top of that, there’s a growing movement in some places that encourages women to return to so-called “traditional” roles. Let’s face it—tech has historically been a boys’ club, which is why DEI programs, female mentorship, and women-in-tech networks are so crucial. That said, lots of professional women aren’t about to give up their career paths. They know that a life in tech doesn’t just provide financial stability; it also offers personal growth, adventure, and a sense of real purpose.

    Sure, there’s backlash. But if anything, it’s made women more determined. Losing groups like WWC doesn’t cancel out our progress—it just shows us that we may need new, stronger infrastructures and communities to keep the momentum going.

    Adapting DEI Strategies—and Holding Steady

    Adapting DEI Strategies—and Holding Steady

    Even with traditional diversity programs getting cut, many companies still see the importance of DEI. Some simply avoid the term “diversity” because of political pushback, instead adopting titles like “Community & Inclusion,” or folding these efforts into Learning & Development. But the mission—creating inclusive workplaces—remains. Businesses that invest in inclusion often report better employee retention, higher innovation, and stronger returns.

    Government leaders can help, too. Claudia Sheinbaum recently took office as Mexico’s president, and it’s still unclear how she’ll champion STEM careers for women. There’s hope she’ll bring in policies and programs that get more girls interested in STEM and help women advance in tech. But that all depends on the right funding, political will, and collective effort.

    Building Community from the Inside

    Grassroots communities are just as important as government programs. At Scio, for example, our “women circles” let participants pick up both soft and technical skills, while also discussing how DEI changes affect the workplace. These circles are like micro-communities, providing safe spaces to share concerns, brainstorm solutions, and celebrate achievements. The fact that they’re often volunteer-driven proves that mentorship and collaboration don’t have to rely on big budgets or official branding.

    What’s Next?

    So will the push toward “traditional” roles win out, or will women maintain—and even expand—their place in tech? Historically, progress might slow down, but it rarely stops entirely. The tech industry, after all, thrives on fresh ideas and talent from every corner. Ignoring half the population just isn’t good business.
    Women—in Mexico, the U.S., and everywhere else—are sticking to their goals. Yes, decreasing DEI support might slow us down, but it also pushes us to find new ways to move forward. Whether it’s launching local initiatives, seeking leadership allies, or keeping our skills sharp, women in tech are forging a future that’s more inclusive for everyone.
    DEI might be under assault, but our collective resilience is rising to meet the challenge. We’re still aiming for a bigger piece of the tech pie, and that can only be good news for the entire industry.

    Sources for further reading:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cw0769446nyo
    https://www.cio.com/article/3477870/5-reasons-women-make-top-team-first-collaborators-in-tech.html
    https://ciep.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Mujeres-en-la-Ciencia-y-Tecnologia.-Presupuesto-para-los-desafios-del-mercado-laboral..pdf
    https://www.talent-works.com/2024/12/how-is-the-dei-landscape-changing-in-2025/
    https://www.cio.com/article/201905/women-in-tech-statistics-the-hard-truths-of-an-uphill-battle.html

    Yamila Solari

    Yamila Solari

    General Manager

    Turning Around a Slumping Team Morale 

    Turning Around a Slumping Team Morale 

    Written by Yamila Solari – 

    Turning Around a Slumping Team Morale

    Have you ever noticed how your team starts off full of energy—everyone is on board, ready to tackle big goals—only for that spark to fade over time? Suddenly, you realize there is a heavy cloud of negativity hanging over daily interactions. It can catch you off guard, especially when you are deeply immersed in the day-to-day work. Yet, once you recognize the signs, you know something must change.

    In my experience coaching teams, these morale slumps often stem from a handful of core issues. Some factors lie outside of the team’s control—company-level decisions, mergers, or major leadership changes. Others, however, are well within a team’s power to address—unclear roles, a lack of transparency, or toxic behaviors that go unchecked. I like to think of these issues in two categories: external (things we cannot fully control) and internal (things we can change ourselves).

    When External Forces Take Over (External Locus of Control)

    • Leadership Changes or Inconsistency

    It is well known that a supportive, empowering leader fosters a collaborative tone. However, if the leadership style changes abruptly or leadership roles become unclear, team members may feel insecure about priorities and direction. This can quickly lead to anxiety and, eventually, a negative environment.

    • High-Pressure Environments

    Sometimes, companies shorten deadlines or raise expectations without adding resources. Teams then scramble to keep up, which can lead to burnout. When people feel overworked and overwhelmed, patience runs thin and tensions rise—creating an ideal scenario for conflict.

    • Lack of Recognition and Growth Opportunities

    Few things derail motivation faster than feeling invisible. If team members consistently contribute without acknowledgment—or if there is no clear path for them to develop new skills—they may become cynical or disengaged.
    Large Structural Changes (Mergers, Acquisitions, Reorganizations)
    Merging organizations often involves blending different cultures, processes, and leadership styles. In the midst of these changes, employees may feel threatened about job security or uncertain about the new direction, which can lead to pervasive negativity.

    • Shifting Company Strategy or Values

    Suppose your company pivots to emphasize profits over people or makes a drastic change to its mission. Those who joined with a particular vision in mind might feel disconnected or even resentful if they no longer believe in the new direction.

    • Other External Stressors

    Broader circumstances—such as economic downturns or new market competitors—can put an entire organization on edge. If the team senses looming layoffs or limited resources, tensions may escalate, leading to finger-pointing and blame.

    Issues Your Team Can Tackle Directly (Internal Locus of Control)

    Issues Your Team Can Tackle Directly (Internal Locus of Control)

    • Unclear Roles and Responsibilities

    Sometimes negativity arises simply because responsibilities are not clearly defined. Tasks may overlap—or worse, fall through the cracks—and frustration builds. If certain teammates end up overloaded while others have significantly lighter workloads, resentment becomes almost inevitable.

    • Communication Breakdowns

    Inconsistent or delayed updates make team members feel left out, sparking suspicion. The tone of feedback also matters: when criticism is vague or sarcastic, trust erodes. Encouraging honest, direct communication is vital for keeping relationships strong.

    • Negative Feedback Loops

    A blame culture can spiral quickly if people focus on fault-finding rather than solutions. Once everyone is trying to avoid blame, creativity and healthy risk-taking tend to vanish.

    • Toxic Individual Behaviors

    In some cases, one or two strong personalities overshadow the rest, or small cliques form. These patterns discourage broader participation—team members may stop sharing opinions or ideas if they fear being dismissed or excluded.

    Breaking the Inertia: The Deep Check-In Session

    Recognizing a cultural slump is half the battle. What comes next? One effective approach is to pause regular work and hold a Deep Check-In Session (DCS)—a specialized retrospective that allows ample time for meaningful discussion.

    • Ground the Team: Begin by having everyone take a moment to note how they are feeling, both physically and mentally.
    • Nurture Trust: Start with a simple trust exercise or team-building activity, reminding everyone that it is a safe space to share openly.
    • Identify the Core Issues: Use quick brainstorming methods (e.g., sticky notes or digital boards) to list all observed problems. Prioritize those that seem most pressing.
    • Distinguish External vs. Internal: Determine which problems the team can address directly and which require help from senior management or other departments. Simply clarifying this can provide a sense of relief and direction.

    By the end of a DCS, you should have a clearer view of your team’s concerns and a sense of which issues belong to the team to solve, and which must be escalated.

    Handling Internal Issues

    Handling Internal Issues

    When the team itself can resolve an issue, determine the best plan of attack after the DCS. You might schedule a follow-up session to brainstorm solutions and agree on next steps. Or perhaps you need more context—so you talk to individuals privately or consult an expert. In any case, keep the team in the loop so they know progress is being made.

    What Matters Most? Listening and Reporting Back

    It is not always possible to resolve every concern immediately. Often, simply letting the team know you have heard them and are taking steps to address their issues can restore a sense of optimism. Continue gathering feedback, be transparent about what you learn, and involve the team in deciding how to move forward.

    Cultivating a healthy team morale is an ongoing process—there is no quick fix. Yet by confronting problems directly, clarifying their root causes, and showing genuine care for your team’s well-being, you will be well on your way to turning a slump around. After all, there is real value in collective understanding and consistent connection, no matter what obstacles appear along the way.

    A Nearshore Perspective

    Scio provides dedicated teams of Latin American (LATAM) software engineers to North American clients. In a nearshore environment like ours, transparent communication is vital to delivering the level of service our clients expect. When teams openly discuss blockers, progress, and expectations, they strengthen the collaboration between clients and software development teams—which is why Deep Check-Ins are so important. At the same time, having clear escalation paths ensures that both our managers and our clients’ leadership understand how external factors affect our teams, allowing them to take timely and effective action.

    If you would like to learn more about fostering a high-performance culture or explore how Scio’s nearshore teams can support your next project, reach out to us. We look forward to collaborating with you to create thriving, impactful software solutions.

    Yamila Solari

    Yamila Solari

    General Manager

    Enriching the Space for Women in Tech: The Power of Circles 

    Enriching the Space for Women in Tech: The Power of Circles 

    Written by Yamila Solari – 

    HOW WOMEN CIRCLES IN TECH SUPPORT DIVERSITY

    Women have gathered in circles since the beginning of history, sharing stories, offering support, and cultivating growth—a practice that continues to shape the professional landscape today. In this article, I focus on professional women circles, which are created to support the advancement of women in the workplace. Specifically, I will share our own experience at Scio with our circles for women in tech, explore the impact these circles could have in the male-dominated tech industry and reflect on how men circles are also important to increase diversity.

    Background

    The history of women’s circles experienced a significant interruption during the 16th and 17th centuries. The rise of the witch trials in Europe led to the persecution of women who participated in these gatherings, forcing them to dissolve or go into secrecy. However, by the 19th century, women’s circles reemerged as organized clubs and societies in parts of the world, including the United States. These groups focused on education, social reform, women’s rights, and community improvement.

    While the structure of these gatherings has evolved, their core purpose of connection and empowerment remains steadfast. Today, modern women’s circles address a wide range of interests, from spiritual exploration and collective healing to professional and personal growth.

    Most recently, Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In movement has reinvigorated the concept of professional circles by making them more accessible through free educational materials. Lean In circles emphasize leadership development, career advancement, and mutual support, among other topics, and have inspired countless women to create their own circles.

    Our Experience at Scio

    Our Experience at Scio

    At Scio, we wanted to support women in tech and decided to start within our organization, so two senior colleagues and I began exploring options. We discovered LeanIn.Org, an organization that has inspired the creation of over 60,000 circles in more than 188 countries, with 85% of participants reporting positive changes in their lives due to their involvement.

    We launched our first circle in June 2023 and have been meeting monthly ever since. Initially, we followed the topics provided by LeanIn.Org, but we soon began developing our own. These have included not only general leadership issues but also challenges uniquely faced by women in male-dominated industries. Topics have included Being the Only One in the Room, How to Respond to Microaggressions, Overcoming Self-Doubt, and Getting the Recognition You Deserve, among others.

    In a recent retrospective session, participants shared how the women circle has benefited them:

    • Learning skills and tools to grow professionally
    • Building stronger relationships with other women in the organization
    • Increasing self-confidence by reflecting on achievements
    • Becoming more assertive
    • Feeling supported by other women
    • Gaining the courage to try new things

    One participant shared how strategies discussed in the circle encouraged her to advocate for her ideas during a critical project meeting. Another mentioned that the circle’s support was invaluable during a turbulent personal time. These achievements fill us with pride and determination. We plan to continue meeting monthly, rotating moderation and topic preparation to develop leadership skills further.

    Women in Tech Circles Can Support Diversity

    Globally, only 47.7% of working-age women participate in the workforce. In technology-related fields, women make up less than a third of the global workforce, according to the World Bank. The picture is slightly better in advanced economies like the United States, where women held 35% of tech jobs at the end of 2023. However, their representation drops to less than one-third in leadership positions.

    In LATAM, representation varies by country. For instance, women make up an average of 20% of the tech workforce in Brazil and 17% in Mexico. While progress has been made in promoting the entry of women into the industry, much work remains to be done.

    At Scio, we’ve found that women’s circles effectively empower women in tech to overcome obstacles in their careers and help them remain in the industry. While quantitative data on the direct impact of women in tech circles on increasing diversity is limited, we believe these groups can also serve as a tool for attracting more women to tech. By creating and publicizing spaces that specifically support women, companies can demonstrate their commitment to fostering an inclusive environment.

    Men’s Circles Are Important Too

    Men’s Circles Are Important Too 

    Professional men’s circles, while sometimes critiqued for perpetuating exclusivity, can play a pivotal role in advancing workplace equity. By incorporating discussions on gender dynamics and the unique challenges faced by women in tech, these groups can raise awareness and inspire male professionals to become allies. Programs like Catalyst’s Men Advocating Real Change (MARC) exemplify this approach, equipping men with the tools to advocate for gender equality within their organizations. 

    Engaging men in these conversations is essential, as their involvement significantly enhances the success of equity initiatives. Research indicates that such programs are three times more effective when men actively participate. By fostering understanding and allyship, men’s circles can support individual growth and drive systemic change toward more inclusive workplaces. 

    Create Your Own Circle 

    Whether you’re seeking personal support or aiming to foster inclusivity in your organization, professional circles can be a transformative tool. If you cannot find a circle to join, create one yourself. Resources like Lean In Circles or WomenTech Circles offer guidance on getting started. Once you’ve mastered the basics, explore other topics that resonate with your group. The key is to take the first step—because creating a circle can lead to meaningful change, one meeting at a time. 

    To learn more:

    The Global Women’s Workforce

    The Women Tech Talent Landscape in LATAM

    Women in Tech: How Companies Can Attract, Support, and Retain Them

    Transform your workplace culture

    Thought Leadership: How men can advance gender equity at work

    Yamila Solari

    Yamila Solari

    General Manager