Turning Around a Slumping Team Morale 

Turning Around a Slumping Team Morale 

Written by Yamila Solari – 

Turning Around a Slumping Team Morale

Have you ever noticed how your team starts off full of energy—everyone is on board, ready to tackle big goals—only for that spark to fade over time? Suddenly, you realize there is a heavy cloud of negativity hanging over daily interactions. It can catch you off guard, especially when you are deeply immersed in the day-to-day work. Yet, once you recognize the signs, you know something must change.

In my experience coaching teams, these morale slumps often stem from a handful of core issues. Some factors lie outside of the team’s control—company-level decisions, mergers, or major leadership changes. Others, however, are well within a team’s power to address—unclear roles, a lack of transparency, or toxic behaviors that go unchecked. I like to think of these issues in two categories: external (things we cannot fully control) and internal (things we can change ourselves).

When External Forces Take Over (External Locus of Control)

  • Leadership Changes or Inconsistency

It is well known that a supportive, empowering leader fosters a collaborative tone. However, if the leadership style changes abruptly or leadership roles become unclear, team members may feel insecure about priorities and direction. This can quickly lead to anxiety and, eventually, a negative environment.

  • High-Pressure Environments

Sometimes, companies shorten deadlines or raise expectations without adding resources. Teams then scramble to keep up, which can lead to burnout. When people feel overworked and overwhelmed, patience runs thin and tensions rise—creating an ideal scenario for conflict.

  • Lack of Recognition and Growth Opportunities

Few things derail motivation faster than feeling invisible. If team members consistently contribute without acknowledgment—or if there is no clear path for them to develop new skills—they may become cynical or disengaged.
Large Structural Changes (Mergers, Acquisitions, Reorganizations)
Merging organizations often involves blending different cultures, processes, and leadership styles. In the midst of these changes, employees may feel threatened about job security or uncertain about the new direction, which can lead to pervasive negativity.

  • Shifting Company Strategy or Values

Suppose your company pivots to emphasize profits over people or makes a drastic change to its mission. Those who joined with a particular vision in mind might feel disconnected or even resentful if they no longer believe in the new direction.

  • Other External Stressors

Broader circumstances—such as economic downturns or new market competitors—can put an entire organization on edge. If the team senses looming layoffs or limited resources, tensions may escalate, leading to finger-pointing and blame.

Issues Your Team Can Tackle Directly (Internal Locus of Control)

Issues Your Team Can Tackle Directly (Internal Locus of Control)

  • Unclear Roles and Responsibilities

Sometimes negativity arises simply because responsibilities are not clearly defined. Tasks may overlap—or worse, fall through the cracks—and frustration builds. If certain teammates end up overloaded while others have significantly lighter workloads, resentment becomes almost inevitable.

  • Communication Breakdowns

Inconsistent or delayed updates make team members feel left out, sparking suspicion. The tone of feedback also matters: when criticism is vague or sarcastic, trust erodes. Encouraging honest, direct communication is vital for keeping relationships strong.

  • Negative Feedback Loops

A blame culture can spiral quickly if people focus on fault-finding rather than solutions. Once everyone is trying to avoid blame, creativity and healthy risk-taking tend to vanish.

  • Toxic Individual Behaviors

In some cases, one or two strong personalities overshadow the rest, or small cliques form. These patterns discourage broader participation—team members may stop sharing opinions or ideas if they fear being dismissed or excluded.

Breaking the Inertia: The Deep Check-In Session

Recognizing a cultural slump is half the battle. What comes next? One effective approach is to pause regular work and hold a Deep Check-In Session (DCS)—a specialized retrospective that allows ample time for meaningful discussion.

  • Ground the Team: Begin by having everyone take a moment to note how they are feeling, both physically and mentally.
  • Nurture Trust: Start with a simple trust exercise or team-building activity, reminding everyone that it is a safe space to share openly.
  • Identify the Core Issues: Use quick brainstorming methods (e.g., sticky notes or digital boards) to list all observed problems. Prioritize those that seem most pressing.
  • Distinguish External vs. Internal: Determine which problems the team can address directly and which require help from senior management or other departments. Simply clarifying this can provide a sense of relief and direction.

By the end of a DCS, you should have a clearer view of your team’s concerns and a sense of which issues belong to the team to solve, and which must be escalated.

Handling Internal Issues

Handling Internal Issues

When the team itself can resolve an issue, determine the best plan of attack after the DCS. You might schedule a follow-up session to brainstorm solutions and agree on next steps. Or perhaps you need more context—so you talk to individuals privately or consult an expert. In any case, keep the team in the loop so they know progress is being made.

What Matters Most? Listening and Reporting Back

It is not always possible to resolve every concern immediately. Often, simply letting the team know you have heard them and are taking steps to address their issues can restore a sense of optimism. Continue gathering feedback, be transparent about what you learn, and involve the team in deciding how to move forward.

Cultivating a healthy team morale is an ongoing process—there is no quick fix. Yet by confronting problems directly, clarifying their root causes, and showing genuine care for your team’s well-being, you will be well on your way to turning a slump around. After all, there is real value in collective understanding and consistent connection, no matter what obstacles appear along the way.

A Nearshore Perspective

Scio provides dedicated teams of Latin American (LATAM) software engineers to North American clients. In a nearshore environment like ours, transparent communication is vital to delivering the level of service our clients expect. When teams openly discuss blockers, progress, and expectations, they strengthen the collaboration between clients and software development teams—which is why Deep Check-Ins are so important. At the same time, having clear escalation paths ensures that both our managers and our clients’ leadership understand how external factors affect our teams, allowing them to take timely and effective action.

If you would like to learn more about fostering a high-performance culture or explore how Scio’s nearshore teams can support your next project, reach out to us. We look forward to collaborating with you to create thriving, impactful software solutions.

Yamila Solari

Yamila Solari

General Manager

The Value of Being «Low Maintenance» in Nearshore Software Development 

The Value of Being «Low Maintenance» in Nearshore Software Development 

Written by: Luis Aburto – 

The Value of Being "Low Maintenance" in Nearshore Software Development

A few weeks ago, members of our Customer Success team had a conversation with the VP of Engineering of one of our long-term clients. We have been working with them for over five years, helping them augment their software engineering team with developers in Mexico and Argentina.

She spoke highly of her experience working with Scio over the years, but one phrase stood out: she appreciated working with us because both our company and our nearshore engineers were «low maintenance.»

This is one of the best compliments I have ever received. It confirms that we are achieving a key goal—seamlessly integrating into our clients’ workflows so they don’t notice a difference between their in-house team members and the engineers provided by Scio. This reinforces why nearshore outsourcing companies are an attractive option for businesses looking for efficiency and reliability in software development.

For a VP of Engineering juggling multiple priorities, working with people and organizations that are «low maintenance» is a huge advantage. It means they don’t have to spend additional time and effort dealing with issues, misalignment, misunderstandings, or conflicts—all of which can be distracting and emotionally draining.

Additionally, I know this client has faced challenges in communication, alignment, and performance with some of their in-house software engineers. So, it was reassuring to hear that our engineers are perceived as «lower maintenance» than some of their internal team members.

Even after five years of working together, this client still finds us easy to work with—something that is intentional and a core element of our approach. This is part of what makes strategic digital nearshoring such an effective solution for companies aiming to build strong, scalable engineering teams.

How We Make Working with Scio Easy

How We Make Working with Scio Easy

We take deliberate steps to ensure that clients find it easy to work with Scio as a partner and that they find it easy to collaborate with the software engineers assigned to their projects.
From a Partnership Perspective

  • Flexible Contracts: We structure our contracts to be adaptable to our clients’ evolving needs, ensuring they are never locked into a rigid framework that doesn’t serve their business objectives.
  • Unobtrusive Account Management: While we maintain regular communication, we focus on providing value through useful insights and recommendations rather than overwhelming clients with unnecessary meetings or check-ins.

From a Team Integration Perspective

 

  • Structured Onboarding & Ongoing Performance Tracking: Our onboarding process ensures that engineers integrate seamlessly into clients’ workflows and company culture. We also provide ongoing performance tracking to maintain alignment and productivity.
  • Culture of Service & Growth: We instill in our team members a mindset of being proactive yet respectful contributors to the project team, ensuring a collaborative and efficient working relationship.
  • Real-Time Collaboration: By operating in the same or similar time zones as our clients, our engineers can collaborate in real time, reducing delays and improving responsiveness.
  • Cultural Compatibility: Unlike some other regions, Latin American cultures emphasize service, collectivism, and teamwork, making it easier for our engineers to adapt and integrate into our clients’ environments.
"Low Maintenance" Doesn't Happen by Accident

«Low Maintenance» Doesn’t Happen by Accident

There are inherent advantages to working with nearshore outsourcing companies, such as time zone alignment and cultural affinity. However, translating these advantages into a consistently smooth working experience requires conscious effort. A great strategic digital nearshoring partnership isn’t just about hiring engineers in the right region—it’s about fostering the right behaviors, structures, and systems that ensure seamless integration and high performance.

At Scio, we have designed our approach around the principle of being «low maintenance,» making it easy for our clients to work with us and for our engineers to integrate seamlessly into their teams. This approach involves everything from operational flexibility to a carefully cultivated team culture, ensuring that we continue to meet and exceed expectations.

It’s rewarding to hear that this effort is recognized and appreciated. As we continue to evolve, we remain committed to refining our processes and ensuring that our clients can rely on us as a truly «low maintenance» partner in strategic digital nearshoring.

Cheers to that.

Luis Aburto_ CEO_Scio

Luis Aburto

CEO

How Top Software Companies Are Revolutionizing Developer Experience in 2025 

How Top Software Companies Are Revolutionizing Developer Experience in 2025 

Written by: Rod Aburto – 

How Top Software Companies Are Revolutionizing Developer Experience in 2025

In the rapidly evolving tech landscape, leading software development companies are placing a strong emphasis on enhancing Developer Experience (DX) to attract and retain top talent, boost productivity, and foster innovation. By investing in tools, processes, and cultures that prioritize developer satisfaction, these companies set benchmarks in the industry by nurturing best practices in coding, enhancing software engineering while maintaining happy developers.

Atlassian: Pioneering Developer-Centric Approaches

Atlassian has made significant strides in improving DX by centering their processes around developers’ needs. Their recent research highlights the importance of understanding and enhancing developer satisfaction. By focusing on reducing obstacles and inefficiencies, Atlassian has seen a 25 percentage point increase in developer satisfaction over two years, rising from 49% to 74%. This improvement underscores the company’s commitment to creating an environment where developers can thrive.

GitHub: Integrating AI to Elevate Coding Efficiency

GitHub has been at the forefront of integrating AI into the development workflow. Their AI-powered coding assistant, GitHub Copilot, is designed to enhance coding efficiency by providing real-time code suggestions and automating repetitive tasks. This tool allows developers to focus more on creative problem-solving and less on routine coding chores, thereby improving overall productivity and job satisfaction.

Google: Innovating with AI-Powered Developer Tools

Google continues to innovate in the DX space with the introduction of «Jules,» an experimental AI-powered coding assistant. Jules is designed to automatically fix coding errors, handle bug fixes, and manage time-consuming tasks, enabling developers to concentrate on building new features and improving existing ones. This initiative reflects Google’s commitment to leveraging AI to streamline development processes and enhance the developer experience.

Microsoft: Quantifying and Enhancing DX

Microsoft, in collaboration with GitHub, has conducted joint studies to quantify the impact of optimizing DX. These studies aim to understand how improving developer workflows and reducing friction can lead to better productivity and job satisfaction. By focusing on data-driven approaches to enhance DX, Microsoft demonstrates its dedication to creating a supportive environment for developers.

CSHARK: Emphasizing Agile Methodologies and Developer Growth

CSHARK, a Polish-based software development company, focuses on creating a developer-friendly environment through Agile methodologies and a strong emphasis on continuous learning. Their approach includes fostering open communication, providing opportunities for professional development, and maintaining a culture that values innovation and collaboration. This commitment to DX has positioned CSHARK as a notable player in the industry.

Imaginary Cloud: Prioritizing User-Centered Design and Developer Satisfaction

Imaginary Cloud designs scalable technology with a focus on user-centered solutions, which extends to their internal processes as well. By implementing proprietary development processes that guarantee reliable solutions, they create an environment where developers can work efficiently and effectively. This focus on DX ensures that their teams are motivated and equipped to deliver high-quality products.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Leading software development companies recognize that enhancing Developer Experience is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge. By investing in AI-powered tools, fostering supportive cultures, and streamlining workflows, these organizations not only boost productivity but also ensure higher job satisfaction among their developers. As the industry continues to evolve, prioritizing DX will remain a key factor in attracting and retaining top talent. This is the challenge for all software companies alike: onshore, nearshore and offshore companies that want to be at the forefront of innovation and business creation.

Rod Aburto - Senior Partner

Rod Aburto

Senior Partner

Fueling Continuous Improvement in Scrum Teams 

Fueling Continuous Improvement in Scrum Teams 

Written by: Yamila Solari – 

BLOG- Fueling Continuous Improvement in Scrum Teams
Continuous improvement is the ongoing process of analyzing performance, identifying opportunities, and making incremental changes to processes, products, and personnel. Scrum team leaders, Scrum Masters, team coaches, all are responsible for instilling a continuous improvement mindset in their teams and find better ways to maximize value, effectiveness, and growth.

Continuous improvement is an essential component of Scrum. Scrum’s three empirical pillars—transparency, inspection, and adaptation—ensure that continuous improvement is woven into the framework itself. Each Scrum event and artifact provides opportunities for the Scrum Team to continually inspect and adapt. In this article, I will cover important factors that contribute to the success of the philosophy of continuous improvement in a team, as well as some precautions necessary to keep teams motivated to improve.

Measuring Progress is Essential for Continuous Improvement

Measuring progress is crucial because it helps the team spot areas that need work, making improvement possible in every sprint. There are various ways to measure progress in Scrum, such as:

  • Checking if sprint goals were achieved
  • Using velocity (the rate at which the team completes work)
  • Tracking bug density
  • Using burndown charts

It’s important to pick the metrics that better allow you to see the progress in your project and set up a reliable system to track them. To avoid overwhelming your team, focus on just a few key metrics—somewhere between three and five. Also, stay consistent with the frequency of your measurements. Many experts recommend measuring after every sprint to keep a regular pulse on your team’s performance.

Elements that Promote Continuous Improvement in a Team

Elements that Promote Continuous Improvement in a Team

We, as humans, are wired for growth—which naturally requires change and adaptation. However, our brains also prioritize routine and efficiency, which can make continuous improvement tricky. Let’s look at some key factors that help foster a continuous improvement culture:

  • Psychological Safety

Cognitive Resource Theory says that when we’re under stress, we tend to revert to familiar routines rather than innovative thinking. Under pressure, decision-making abilities can decline, making it harder to adapt to new challenges.

This is why the first element to consider, as a team leader, is creating a psychologically safe space. Psychological safety is the belief that no one will be punished, humiliated, or ignored for speaking up with ideas, questions, or mistakes. When team members feel safe to share openly, they’re more likely to push for creative solutions and take on new experiments that drive improvement.

  • Transparent and Regular Feedback

In a high-performing team, members often share better ways of working with each other in real time. However, it’s also crucial to have dedicated events—like Retrospectives—where the whole team reflects on what went well and what could change. This practice reminds everyone to look inward for those gems of insight that can lead to significant improvements.

  • Represent Progress in a Graphic way

Using meaningful metrics or tracking tools is the third element. It helps the team visualize and understand their evolution over time. Whether it’s velocity, defect rates, or burndown charts, consistent tracking keeps everyone aware of the impact of their efforts and highlights where to improve next. Remember to display these graphics in a place of easy access for the team and refer to them during your Scrum ceremonies.

  • Frequently Sharing the Vision

A clear vision reminds the team why they’re doing what they’re doing. Reiterating the vision fosters alignment, engagement, and motivation. When everyone knows how their work contributes to the bigger picture, it’s easier to stay focused on improvement and long-term goals.

  • Empowering Teams with Autonomy

Ensuring a team has autonomy within the organization is a powerful motivator. When teams know their decisions will be heard and respected, they’re more intrinsically motivated to give their best and continually refine how they work.

  • Celebrating Success

Finally, celebrating success is a powerful way to cement progress in the team culture and keep up the momentum. Recognizing achievements—big or small—builds confidence and reinforces positive behaviors. When the team sees that progress is noticed and valued, they’re more willing to experiment and try new approaches.

The Double-Edged Sword of Continuous Improvement

Agile methodologies like Scrum and Kanban are designed to structure work so it’s efficient, transparent, and motivating for the team. Often, a team that consistently achieves its sprint goals is already high-performing and well-accustomed to improving continuously. However, when a high-performing team is making only minor improvements, metrics like velocity can become less meaningful, or even demotivating. Sometimes the numbers simply don’t show big jumps, but that doesn’t mean the team isn’t growing.

In these situations, the role of the team leader or Scrum Master becomes more relevant. As leaders, we should always be ready to pose questions to inspire our teams. Questions like what did we do better this sprint than the last?, In what specific ways are we a more high-performing team than before?, If our velocity has not changed, what has improved?, etc., help the team acknowledge they are moving forward even though the metrics may not show it. Also, reflecting on qualitative improvements—like deeper communication, willingness to take risks, and the ability to advocate for the team’s needs—plays an essential role in understanding true progress.

On the flip side, some teams lean towards complacency. They can be high performing for a while, but then they find Retrospectives no longer yield much value, start skipping them, and adopt a “there’s nothing to improve” attitude. Inevitably, any dip in velocity or other performance metrics will alert the team that something is amiss. At that point, the leader or Scrum Master can moderate a deep reflection on how the team allowed complacency to set in, and how to prevent it from happening again.

Ultimately, embracing a continuous improvement mindset requires a healthy balance. Experiment and try new ways to get better, but also recognize the diminishing returns that can appear once your team is operating at a high level.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Continuous improvement is a cornerstone of Scrum for a reason—it drives better outcomes, keeps people engaged, and helps teams adapt in a fast-changing world. As a business manager and team coach, I’ve seen firsthand how paying attention to psychological safety, feedback loops, and consistent measurements can ignite powerful changes in a team’s performance and morale. But remember, improvements can be both quantitative and qualitative. Recognize the accomplishments your team makes, even if they don’t always show up in velocity numbers. Keep finding ways to grow, and never underestimate the power of celebrating and reflecting on how far you’ve come. 

Yamila Solari

Yamila Solari

General Manager

Enriching the Space for Women in Tech: The Power of Circles 

Enriching the Space for Women in Tech: The Power of Circles 

Written by Yamila Solari – 

HOW WOMEN CIRCLES IN TECH SUPPORT DIVERSITY

Women have gathered in circles since the beginning of history, sharing stories, offering support, and cultivating growth—a practice that continues to shape the professional landscape today. In this article, I focus on professional women circles, which are created to support the advancement of women in the workplace. Specifically, I will share our own experience at Scio with our circles for women in tech, explore the impact these circles could have in the male-dominated tech industry and reflect on how men circles are also important to increase diversity.

Background

The history of women’s circles experienced a significant interruption during the 16th and 17th centuries. The rise of the witch trials in Europe led to the persecution of women who participated in these gatherings, forcing them to dissolve or go into secrecy. However, by the 19th century, women’s circles reemerged as organized clubs and societies in parts of the world, including the United States. These groups focused on education, social reform, women’s rights, and community improvement.

While the structure of these gatherings has evolved, their core purpose of connection and empowerment remains steadfast. Today, modern women’s circles address a wide range of interests, from spiritual exploration and collective healing to professional and personal growth.

Most recently, Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In movement has reinvigorated the concept of professional circles by making them more accessible through free educational materials. Lean In circles emphasize leadership development, career advancement, and mutual support, among other topics, and have inspired countless women to create their own circles.

Our Experience at Scio

Our Experience at Scio

At Scio, we wanted to support women in tech and decided to start within our organization, so two senior colleagues and I began exploring options. We discovered LeanIn.Org, an organization that has inspired the creation of over 60,000 circles in more than 188 countries, with 85% of participants reporting positive changes in their lives due to their involvement.

We launched our first circle in June 2023 and have been meeting monthly ever since. Initially, we followed the topics provided by LeanIn.Org, but we soon began developing our own. These have included not only general leadership issues but also challenges uniquely faced by women in male-dominated industries. Topics have included Being the Only One in the Room, How to Respond to Microaggressions, Overcoming Self-Doubt, and Getting the Recognition You Deserve, among others.

In a recent retrospective session, participants shared how the women circle has benefited them:

  • Learning skills and tools to grow professionally
  • Building stronger relationships with other women in the organization
  • Increasing self-confidence by reflecting on achievements
  • Becoming more assertive
  • Feeling supported by other women
  • Gaining the courage to try new things

One participant shared how strategies discussed in the circle encouraged her to advocate for her ideas during a critical project meeting. Another mentioned that the circle’s support was invaluable during a turbulent personal time. These achievements fill us with pride and determination. We plan to continue meeting monthly, rotating moderation and topic preparation to develop leadership skills further.

Women in Tech Circles Can Support Diversity

Globally, only 47.7% of working-age women participate in the workforce. In technology-related fields, women make up less than a third of the global workforce, according to the World Bank. The picture is slightly better in advanced economies like the United States, where women held 35% of tech jobs at the end of 2023. However, their representation drops to less than one-third in leadership positions.

In LATAM, representation varies by country. For instance, women make up an average of 20% of the tech workforce in Brazil and 17% in Mexico. While progress has been made in promoting the entry of women into the industry, much work remains to be done.

At Scio, we’ve found that women’s circles effectively empower women in tech to overcome obstacles in their careers and help them remain in the industry. While quantitative data on the direct impact of women in tech circles on increasing diversity is limited, we believe these groups can also serve as a tool for attracting more women to tech. By creating and publicizing spaces that specifically support women, companies can demonstrate their commitment to fostering an inclusive environment.

Men’s Circles Are Important Too

Men’s Circles Are Important Too 

Professional men’s circles, while sometimes critiqued for perpetuating exclusivity, can play a pivotal role in advancing workplace equity. By incorporating discussions on gender dynamics and the unique challenges faced by women in tech, these groups can raise awareness and inspire male professionals to become allies. Programs like Catalyst’s Men Advocating Real Change (MARC) exemplify this approach, equipping men with the tools to advocate for gender equality within their organizations. 

Engaging men in these conversations is essential, as their involvement significantly enhances the success of equity initiatives. Research indicates that such programs are three times more effective when men actively participate. By fostering understanding and allyship, men’s circles can support individual growth and drive systemic change toward more inclusive workplaces. 

Create Your Own Circle 

Whether you’re seeking personal support or aiming to foster inclusivity in your organization, professional circles can be a transformative tool. If you cannot find a circle to join, create one yourself. Resources like Lean In Circles or WomenTech Circles offer guidance on getting started. Once you’ve mastered the basics, explore other topics that resonate with your group. The key is to take the first step—because creating a circle can lead to meaningful change, one meeting at a time. 

To learn more:

The Global Women’s Workforce

The Women Tech Talent Landscape in LATAM

Women in Tech: How Companies Can Attract, Support, and Retain Them

Transform your workplace culture

Thought Leadership: How men can advance gender equity at work

Yamila Solari

Yamila Solari

General Manager

Expressing Needs is Essential for High-Performing Teams: Tips for Team Leaders 

Expressing Needs is Essential for High-Performing Teams: Tips for Team Leaders 

Written by: Yamila Solari 

Why High-Performing Engineering Teams Depend on Expressed Needs

Every engineering leader has seen it happen. A team looks strong on paper, the talent is there, the rituals are in place, yet something feels stuck. Work slows down, friction increases, quality drops, or communication becomes strained. In many cases, the root issue isn’t process, tooling, or skill—it’s unexpressed needs.
In technical environments with aggressive delivery targets, distributed teams, and constant context-switching, expressing needs is more than interpersonal nicety. It is an operational requirement. Needs guide clarity, unblock workflows, reduce misunderstandings, and help teams function with purpose instead of pressure.
And while most leaders recognize this intuitively, engineering teams often struggle to say what they need. It can feel vulnerable or uncomfortable. Some worry it sends the wrong message. Others don’t know how to articulate needs without sounding critical. But when teams stay silent, performance suffers.
For more than a decade, this pattern has surfaced repeatedly in engineering teams I’ve coached. The teams that consistently perform at a high level—regardless of methodology, tech stack, or team size—share one trait: members can express what they need with clarity, confidence, and respect. And when that behavior is supported by leadership, the team becomes far more effective, collaborative, and accountable.
This article explores why needs matter, why teams avoid expressing them, and how leaders can create an environment where expressing needs is standard practice. It’s written for CTOs, VPs of Engineering, and team leaders who want to strengthen team health without adding layers of process. And it aligns with one of the core beliefs at Scio: great engineering work happens when teams feel supported, trusted, and easy to work with.

What Needs Are—and Why They Matter for Engineering Teams

In the context of engineering work, needs are not personal preferences or surface-level requests. Needs are the essential conditions—professional, cognitive, physical, and emotional—that allow people to do their jobs effectively. They shape how team members focus, collaborate, and contribute. When unmet, they introduce unnecessary friction that slowly erodes performance.
Marshall B. Rosenberg, who developed Nonviolent Communication, defined needs as the core drivers behind our behaviors and decisions. When needs are unspoken, people rely on assumptions, and those assumptions often lead to conflict, rework, or misalignment. When needs are spoken openly, teams can coordinate more intelligently, adjust expectations sooner, and prevent misunderstandings that waste time and energy.
In engineering environments, needs often show up in concrete ways:
“I need clearer acceptance criteria before implementing this feature.”

“I need uninterrupted time to finish this module.”

“I need help understanding the dependencies on this integration.”

“I need early notice of scope changes to avoid rework.”

These are not emotional complaints—they are operational insights.
Engineering teams benefit from expressed needs because they:
Reduce ambiguity, which is one of the biggest sources of churn.

Strengthen trust by making expectations explicit.

Prevent bottlenecks by surfacing blockers early.

Keep workloads realistic and sustainable.

Support psychological safety, especially in multicultural groups.

Enable leaders to respond with precision rather than guesswork.

When a team makes a habit of expressing needs, the overall system improves. Project management becomes more predictable. Cross-functional collaboration becomes smoother. Agile ceremonies become more useful. And most importantly, teams maintain momentum without burning out.
The challenge is not understanding that needs matter—leaders know that. The challenge is creating a culture where people believe it’s safe and worthwhile to say what they need.

Why Needs Often Go Unexpressed: The Hidden Barriers That Slow Teams Down

Even high-performing teams hesitate to express their needs. Not because they don’t have them, but because several internal and cultural barriers get in the way.
Fear of Judgment or Perception
Engineers often worry that expressing needs will make them look:
Less capable

Less senior

Less resilient under pressure

In environments where “figuring it out” is seen as a sign of strength, many stay silent to protect their reputation.
Cultural Norms and Intercultural Friction
In global and nearshore environments, cultural expectations strongly influence how people communicate. Some cultures prioritize direct communication; others lean toward harmony and subtlety. When expectations are unclear, people default to silence rather than risk misunderstanding. This is one of the reasons why nearshore collaborations work best when the partnering teams share time zones, cultural context, and communication norms—a strength Scio integrates deeply in our engagements.
Confusing Needs with Complaints
Many team members avoid expressing needs because they don’t want to sound like they’re complaining. For instance:
Complaint: “I’m tired of unclear requirements.”

Need: “I need clearer requirements before I estimate this work.”

This distinction is critical. Needs focus on clarity and improvement. Complaints focus on frustration.
Fear of Creating More Work for Others
Some avoid expressing needs because they don’t want to burden teammates, even when silence ultimately causes more rework.
Past Negative Experiences
If someone expressed a need in the past and it was ignored, dismissed, or punished, they learn not to try again.
The Cost of Silence
The consequences of unexpressed needs compound quickly:
Burnout caused by unrealistic workloads

Missed deadlines due to unclear expectations

Decreased quality resulting from rushed or unsupported work

Growing resentment between teammates

Reduced trust in leadership

Difficulty sustaining high performance across sprints

One developer I coached earlier in my career experienced this firsthand. They were juggling several large features but hesitated to say anything because the team was under pressure. The unspoken need—a more realistic workload—resulted in late nights, missed commitments, and eventually burnout. The team suffered. Leadership suffered. And delivery suffered.
Silence is always more expensive than clarity.

How Scrum and Agile Rituals Create Natural Moments for Expressing Needs

Agile frameworks, especially Scrum, are designed to surface needs before they create downstream problems. But this only works when teams use the ceremonies as they were intended—not as status meetings, but as alignment and support tools.
Daily Scrum
The daily stand-up is not for reporting. It’s for coordination. A simple statement like:
“I need help understanding the behavior of this API.”

“I need more context before I can continue.”

“I need pairing time to debug this issue.”

…can save hours or days of stalled work.
Used well, the Daily Scrum becomes a lightweight, structured opportunity to express needs without drama or formality.
Sprint Planning
Planning is where teams should articulate needs regarding clarity, feasibility, and expectations. This is the moment to say:
“We need clearer acceptance criteria.”

“We need time allocated for refactoring.”

“We need the UX assets before we commit to this story.”

When teams stay quiet during planning, the sprint becomes a gamble.
Sprint Review
Reviews reveal what the team needs from stakeholders: faster decisions, stronger feedback, clearer priorities, or better availability.
Sprint Retrospective
Retrospectives are the clearest space for expressing needs. When facilitated well, they allow teams to articulate:
What helped

What blocked them

What needs to change

What they need from leadership

What they need from each other

Psychological safety is the foundation here. Retrospectives only work when everyone knows their input won’t be dismissed or punished.
Why High-Performing Teams Use These Moments Differently
The difference between average and truly great Agile teams often comes down to this:
Average teams describe what happened.
High-performing teams describe what they need next.
This habit is what makes Agile adaptive, not just iterative.
Clear Strategies for Expressing Needs Effectively
(~300+ words)
Expressing needs is a skill. It gets easier with practice, and leaders can accelerate that progress by teaching simple, repeatable patterns.
1. Use “I” Statements
“I need more clarity to move forward” communicates ownership and intent.
“Someone needs to fix this” communicates judgment.
2. Be Specific
Clarity prevents misinterpretation.
Instead of “I need help,” say:
“I need someone to pair with me for 30 minutes on this debugging issue.”

Instead of “This is confusing,” say:
“I need a concrete example of the expected output.”

3. Connect Needs to Outcomes
Teams respond better when they understand the impact.
“I need earlier notice of scope changes so I can plan effectively.”

“We need a shared understanding of the backlog so we’re aligned on priorities.”

4. Keep Delivery and Impact in Focus
Needs aren’t obstacles—they’re enablers. When framed around quality, predictability, and team health, they gain legitimacy.
5. Model the Behaviors as a Leader
If leaders never express their needs, the team won’t either.
Simple examples:
“I need everyone focused this sprint because production is under pressure.”

“I need open feedback about where our process isn’t working.”

When leaders show vulnerability with purpose, teams follow.

What Team Leaders Can Do to Build a Culture Where Needs Are Expressed Openly

Leaders shape the habits that determine how freely needs are expressed. Here are practical actions engineering leaders can use to build a healthier communication environment:
Model Vulnerability
Strong leaders don’t hide their needs—they demonstrate how to express them clearly. When a leader says, “I need better visibility into the deployment pipeline,” it sets a tone that encourages transparency.
Encourage Regular Dialogue
Start meetings with simple check-ins. It doesn’t need to be emotional. A quick round such as “What’s one thing you need to be successful today?” creates consistency.
Build Trust Through Reliability
Trust grows when leaders keep their word, communicate openly, and make decisions visible. When trust increases, teams express needs without hesitation.
Listen Actively and Respond Thoughtfully
Active listening means more than nodding. It means acknowledging needs, validating them, and collaborating on solutions. When team members feel heard, they continue speaking up.
Offer Constructive, Forward-Moving Feedback
Instead of focusing on what went wrong, pivot to how things can improve:
Not: “This wasn’t good enough.”

Instead: “Let’s walk through how we can strengthen this process together.”

This mindset reduces defensiveness and increases ownership.
Create Structured Opportunities for Open Communication
Use retrospectives, one-on-ones, team health checks, and async channels intentionally. Consistency matters more than frequency.
Protect the Team’s Expressed Needs
Nothing kills transparency faster than a leader who asks for honesty but punishes it. Leaders must defend the team’s needs upward, outward, and across the organization.
When leaders get this right, expressing needs becomes a team reflex rather than a risk.

Simple Comparative Module: Complaints vs. Needs

When It Sounds Like a Complaint
How to Reframe It as a Need
“We get feedback too late.” “We need earlier feedback to reduce rework.”
“This requirement keeps changing.” “We need stable requirements by sprint planning.”
“I’m overwhelmed with this workload.” “I need help prioritizing or redistributing tasks.”
“These meetings take too long.” “We need tighter agendas to stay focused.”

Exercises Teams Can Use to Practice Expressing Needs

Needs Mapping
Each person identifies one professional, emotional, and physical need. As patterns emerge, the team can address them collectively.

Well-Being Check-In
Five minutes at the start or end of a meeting can uncover blockers that would otherwise remain hidden.

Role-Playing Scenarios
Practicing hypothetical situations builds muscle memory for real conversations.

Retrospective Needs Circle
Each team member names one need that was met during the sprint and one that wasn’t.

Needs vs. Complaints Reframing Exercise
Teams practice turning frustration into clear, actionable needs.

These activities become even more effective when integrated into a nearshore or distributed team’s rhythm, reinforcing cultural alignment and communication clarity—two strengths Scio prioritizes in every engagement.

Conclusion: Needs Are the Foundation of High-Performing Teams

Expressing needs is not optional for engineering teams—it’s a core driver of high performance. When teams articulate what they need, they make better decisions, deliver higher-quality work, and build deeper trust. Leaders who encourage this behavior create an environment where teams are aligned, accountable, resilient, and consistently productive.
Start with one simple action: express one need in your next meeting and invite someone else to do the same. Small habits compound into major improvements. And when your teams feel supported—professionally, emotionally, and operationally—they perform at a level that consistently strengthens delivery, relationships, and long-term value.

FAQ

Expressing Needs in Engineering Teams – FAQs

Clear needs beat vague frustration. This is how teams stay aligned, reduce rework, and protect momentum.

Because it reduces ambiguity, improves alignment, and prevents issues from escalating into delays, rework, or burnout.

By modeling honest communication, creating regular spaces for dialogue, and responding constructively when needs are expressed.

A complaint focuses on frustration. A need focuses on what will help the team move forward effectively.

Through structured exercises such as needs mapping, retrospective circles, and reframing sessions.

If you need this adapted into a LinkedIn carousel, formatted for SEO in WordPress, or condensed into a leadership newsletter version, let me know.