The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

Outsourced Engineering Team, Project Management, Software Development

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

The success of any software development cycle relies entirely on the team behind it, and when developers don’t have enough resources to see the project through to its successful completion, it can be a costly outcome for an organization. But when too many resources are allocated at once on a project, unnecessary complexities can be introduced, likely increasing miscommunications and further hindering progress. So finding the perfect balance between talent and resources is essential for any company’s well-being, and flexibility in the size and resources of a team is key for optimal outcomes across the board.

The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

However, the matter of team size in a development environment is no joke, and deciding whether to scale or reduce a software development team can be a complicated situation. The main thing to remember, though, is that the size of a team should be driven by strategic needs, not only organizational cost savings, so to make the best decision, it’s essential to take into account the project objectives and timeline. If the aim is to launch quickly on limited resources but find lasting success, then scaling may be more advantageous than reducing the team. But, if the desired outcome is short-term and specialized resources are not needed, reducing might be the right move. Either way, having the right approach is critical. 

But what gets involved in such a decision? Scaling or reducing teams in software development is a real quandary because you (ideally) want to find the right number of people to dedicate to development projects, yet you also don’t want to over-commit resources that you probably can’t justify in the long run. And without good and exact data on the impact of different variables on the project, decision-making will be based on guesswork, which rarely ends well. 

And all this without mentioning the most important element of this whole situation: the people. It goes without saying, but the effects of reducing a development team after a project can be huge; not only the morale of the team is affected, but there’s the risk that it may lead to lower-quality outcomes. After all, when a member leaves, they not only take with them their knowledge and expertise but also affect the very relationship between collaborators and their organization; trust is the first thing to go after deciding that a dev team is too large to keep. So, it’s up to Management to assess the impact of reducing their team and attempt to lessen any fallout as much as possible, even if it means transferring individuals over to other projects or departments temporarily or permanently. 

However, what if this is just not possible for a mid-sized company with a small IT department? How can these organizations approach the dilemma of needing to develop a technological solution but don’t have the resources to hire and let go of the software professionals as they need? It’s important to weigh the various possibilities carefully when it comes to staffing software development initiatives — after all, it can spell the difference between success and failure.

The challenge of bringing talent

The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

When a mid-sized company wants to bring a software project to life, it often faces the challenge of attracting experienced developers willing to join these short-termed projects. These ventures (which can range from developing new platforms to introducing automation capabilities in existing programs and systems, to doing web design, building enterprise solutions, and even creating mobile apps and improving customer service through technological interventions) are often crucial to a company’s success, yet most experienced developers tend to opt for longer deals elsewhere with the idea that they are more secure. Furthermore, companies also have to compete with large corporate offers, which can seem unrealistic and exaggerated when compared to the smaller compensation packages they can provide, which leaves companies with few options other than recruiting those without less-than-adequate experience, which can be a very unattractive proposal. 

Sure, the gig economy has opened up new opportunities by connecting mid-sized businesses with freelancers who have proven skills and can step in on a project basis, finding reliable talent often requires larger upfront payments or higher premiums than they might otherwise use to onboard full-time employees, so negotiations need to carefully balance the requirements of the developer and what is expected of them with compensation that makes it worth their while. As a result, a mid-sized company must confront several dilemmas to ensure that this decision is successful and produces results: training new members of the team to be properly knowledgeable about the company’s process and demands, issuing the appropriate tools, managing organizational structure, providing timely support from senior management, and considering projections for future growth and corporate objectives without bankrupting the company, or cutting back on quality standards. In short, the challenges involved with scaling up a software development team aren’t something to be taken lightly, but solutions do exist.

“If you’re a mid-sized business, achieving your software development goals may seem daunting. It’s expensive and difficult to build up an internal team of knowledgeable software developers in-house, so partnering with a Nearshore development organization can help you accomplish these ambitions without the worry of in-house management or heavy recruitment costs”, says Luis Aburto, CEO and Founder of Scio, a Nearshore development company located in Mexico. “You’ll get access to talented developers trained across the stack that are just as effective as hiring your own team of engineers, and a company like Scio provides full project management support should you need it. So instead of going through the process of building a fixed team, you can easily adjust and tailor your talent depending on the progress being made. Giving yourself the comfortability to tune your team size at any given moment guarantees you won’t be hindered by slowdowns or lagging projects due to issues of manpower.”

Flexibility as your best decision

The dilemma of scaling a team in software development: What is the best approach to keep the perfect team size?

It’s a big step for any company to choose to scale up its software development teams or start it from scratch. Finding the right balance between cost-effectiveness, training, and onboarding new employees to ensure success is one of the many challenges that a mid-sized organization faces, which often needs to hire top talent while making sure the personnel is not too expensive for the size of its resources. 

That’s why the option of flexibility offered by an external partner, such as a Nearshore company, can be such a critical difference for mid-sized companies looking to accelerate their technology goals. It enables businesses to access top tech talent without the overhead of recruiting and maintaining a large onsite team, and the flexibility to scale up or down depending on the project goals and resources at hand with speed and precision. With access to a wide pool of experts, you get immediate access to the right combination of skills and experience that your business needs — all while keeping your budget under control. These external companies also have access to higher-quality tools, equipment, and technologies, which will ensure the success of your project in far less time compared to hiring in-house developers. What’s more, these dedicated teams are focused on specific project goals and are incredibly flexible, capable of scaling up or down as needed, giving businesses a tremendous amount of control over their software investments.

In short, for mid-sized businesses looking to take their operations to the next level, Nearshore providers offer an ideal staffing solution. Not only do these services provide access to high-skilled and experienced professionals, but they also offer substantial scalability and flexibility in terms of staff numbers. So, instead of having to employ specialized IT resources on a full-time basis, a Nearshore provider means that businesses can benefit from well-trained professionals on demand, meaning staffing levels can be easily adjusted based on need. This not only helps with cost savings initially, but it keeps staffing and project costs down more generally too – allowing your mid-sized business to truly maximize its opportunities in the modern digital economy.

The Key Takeaways

  • Nowadays, software development is a common component of almost any business, but that doesn’t mean that is easy to do.
  • For mid-sized organizations, acquiring talent for a software project is quite a task, for many reasons (costs, onboarding, requirements, etc.)
  • Competition, costs of development, and the finicky nature of the software industry means that these organizations might require alternatives.
  • Nearshore development, for this reason, might be the answer, offering talent, flexibility and expertise that any organization can access, regardless of size or the challenge of the project.

Scio is an established Nearshore software development company based in Mexico that specializes in providing high-quality, cost-effective technologies for pioneering tech companies. We have been building and mentoring teams of engineers since 2003 and our experience gives us access not only to the knowledge but also the expertise needed when tackling any project. Get started today by contacting us about your project needs – We have teams available to help you achieve your business goals. Get in contact today!

How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

Outsourced Engineering Team, Project Management, Successful Outsourcing

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

Running an IT department is not an easy task. With a daily grind of patches, fixes, updates, and all sorts of technical hurdles, most IT professionals know that their workload can sometimes get too overwhelming, making a balancing act between short-term fixes necessary to keep systems running with long-term improvements to futureproof the network. And even with the best preparation, the job of IT can sometimes be challenging and unpredictable, usually with an impossibly long list of tasks that need to be completed. Nothing is ever easy; the person in charge has to navigate through a tangle of hardware and fix whatever problems are presented, while making sure their work will stand the test of time.

How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

However, there are ways to avoid those bad days when everything seems wrong. Taking the time to ensure that all of your to-dos are in order, that essential files and documents are safe, and that data backups are running will go a long way in avoiding panic if something goes wrong. If at all possible, allocate time each week for software updates or checking on vulnerable systems to save you hours of headaches down the road if a potential issue is caught early on. Finally, establishing a rapport with your colleagues is critical, as it ensures that everyone remains on the same page and problems can be easily spotted early on. But even with safeguards like these, things can go sideways in unexpected ways, which can test every ounce of the skill, patience, and determination of an IT professional.

In other words, without the proper support, IT departments face a difficult job, often leading to days from hell for your employees. But with the right partner in IT support, this looming dread becomes a thing of the past — free from these worries, your team can efficiently eliminate many of these time-consuming tasks and have more energy to dedicate to other projects and initiatives within their organization. This shift in priorities allows them to focus on driving technological advances rather than simply running from one issue to the next. With an experienced partner in IT services at your side, you’re setting your team on a clear path for growth that allows everyone to focus on doing their best work.

Avoiding a crisis

How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

Nobody wants days like these in IT, so it’s important to prepare and make a checklist of daily tasks to avoid spreading your attention too much. Keeping an eye on projects and deadlines, prioritizing tasks based on importance, blocking off time for large assignments, always saving work right away, and keeping the organization’s software up-to-date and running smoothly is a bit of standard advice that can save a lot of headaches in the long run. Nevertheless, in a mid-sized company, a crisis can still happen, and a fast and efficient resolution by the IT department is going to be pretty critical.

 The first approach, then, should include gaining an understanding of the full scope of any issue by identifying affected systems and data, as well as any potential implications on the business operations of the whole organization. Once the breadth of the problem has been established, it’s important to consider what methodologies and resources will be needed to manage the crisis properly. For instance, if there are significant hardware issues or a technical outage that needs attention, engaging an IT vendor or specialized contractor ensures that all personnel has the appropriate skill sets and qualifications for remediation. 

Moreover, creating a sound action plan for responding (for example) to customer questions and managing any legal repercussions from a breach can help minimize stress during such trying times. And while no one ever wants to deal with an IT crisis at their company, having a comprehensive plan that covers all possible angles ensures you can tackle it in an orderly fashion for smooth sailing throughout recovery. Time is always of the essence, so the best approach is developing a strategy that considers all stakeholders involved, with quick, proactive communication between departments and employees becoming essential for triaging the issue. It’s also important to be clear about the goals and expectations of the organization so everyone understands the urgency of addressing a problem before the situation gets worse. Having a good system in place to track progress will ensure rapid resolutions; if mistakes are made, acknowledging them quickly and openly with leadership sets the right tone to confront such issues. And seeking outside help when necessary is always a must.

“When a crisis strikes, I know it’s extremely tempting to try and tackle the issue yourself. After all, it’s often time-consuming and expensive to seek out external expertise, but the thing is, seeking an expert can result in a more efficient outcome than spending exhausting hours in front of a keyboard while tasks begin to accumulate”, says Rod Aburto, Service Delivery Manager and Partner at Scio. “External expertise can be fantastic for getting to the bottom of difficult problems quickly and thoroughly, allowing you to get back into business as soon as possible. Plus, with specialized knowledge on your side, you can keep glaring security risks at bay. Ultimately, when it comes to technology, outside assistance can make all the difference in staying ahead of an IT crisis.”

A partnership you can rely on

How to avoid an IT day from hell? Look for the partnerships you deserve

Having a small IT department often means limited access to technical resources, which is a challenge when you want to roll out new projects or solve an IT crisis. And the best way to get around this is to bring Nearshore development support to the table. Nearshore developers can provide expertise on any project your team may not be able to handle, while still allowing you to maintain control of the project efficiently. And by having more knowledgeable people on board who have had experience rolling out similar projects, you can complete work faster and more cost-effectively without sacrificing quality. In the case of the US, a Nearshore company such as Scio, which has some of the best software developers in Latin America, offers close proximity (both culturally and geographically) to their partners, making communication easier and more efficient.

All in all, by partnering with a specialist, any IT department can efficiently eliminate many time-consuming tasks and have more energy to dedicate to other projects and initiatives within their organization. This shift in priorities allows them to focus on driving technological advances rather than simply running from one issue to the next. In short, choosing an outsourcing partner is a great way for IT leaders to create order from chaos and avoid the feeling of a day from hell in the process, or for small or mid-sized IT departments that want better results without upgrading their existing workforce.

Ultimately, when you’re in the midst of an IT crisis, finding the right external expertise can often make or break a resolution, and recruiting well-qualified Nearshore professionals will offer an invaluable response to pressing difficulties facing an organization. Investing in this extra support when your company hits the wall can be a lifesaver and put your organization lightyears ahead in alleviating any IT challenge and ensuring maximum productivity, which is an absolute must if you want to stay ahead of the curve in the digital world.

The Key Takeaways

  • In the IT world, it’s not especially difficult to have a “day from hell” thanks to the demands and responsibilities an IT professional juggles daily.
  • And for a small team, a huge project or a software crisis can be a lot more dangerous than expected, with quick responses as a must-have.
  • For these reasons, having the correct expertise in the field is extremely important, and a development partner is always the right answer.
  • In the case of Nearshore, which offers proximity and technical know-how, these crises can be easily tackled without sacrificing efficiency, or worrying about flexibility in the team.

Scio is an established Nearshore software development company based in Mexico that specializes in providing high-quality, cost-effective technologies for pioneering tech companies. We have been building and mentoring teams of engineers since 2003 and our experience gives us access not only to the knowledge but also the expertise needed when tackling any project. Get started today by contacting us about your project needs – We have teams available to help you achieve your business goals. Get in contact today!

How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

Nearshore, Outsourced Engineering Team

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

When it comes to great software projects, the number of developers involved is incredibly important. Too few developers will lead to an insufficient amount of work being accomplished in a given timeframe, leading to delays or a rushed-feeling product at the end, whereas too many developers can lead to an over-complication of the project and end up costing a lot more than necessary. Therefore, it’s critical to carefully consider how much talent is needed for any project, but finding the ideal number of developers may be challenging for a small IT department that might not have access to all the resources necessary to make it happen.

How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

After all, IT departments that traditionally don’t do software can face a multitude of challenges when attempting to get an ambitious software project off the ground, and a major one is limited resources and personnel. Having not enough people on the team, for example, could result in a long project with a hit in quality due to the limited oversight that this development process can have, and the department size may limit their knowledge base and expertise, presenting a lot of difficulties when finding solutions to the issues that will arise along the way. And let’s not forget that finding adequate funding can be challenging if budgets are strict. Ultimately, a small IT department needs to be smart when dealing with these sorts of circumstances if they wish to be successful with their goals, and having an exact idea of how much talent will be needed to bring it to fruition is key.

Now, we understand that, for a small IT department, estimating the number of outside developers needed to start a project can be a tricky task, so the best first step is for the existing team to evaluate their own skills and capabilities before bringing in any external resources. Finding the right balance between what they can do themselves, and what they need experts to help with. The trick is to anticipate the technical challenges of a project early on, rather than waiting until there’s an issue that can’t be easily solved in-house. Also, it’s a good idea to have someone in the department with experience overseeing development from external parties, which will streamline both communication and collaboration when managing an external development team. The best way to approach Management to get the necessary support is by evaluating the size and complexity of the project, ensuring you understand its scope to come up with a good plan. That way you will have enough resources on board once you bring an external team on board. In the end, having an effective plan in place will give your small IT department greater peace of mind when it comes to resource and talent estimation.

Consider Nearshore

How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

If a small IT department finds itself in a situation where completing a software project is beyond its capability, hiring an external team is a wise decision. Not only will you benefit from having experienced developers specialized in the technology you need, but you’ll also have peace of mind knowing that your project is being handled by experienced professionals in completing tasks quickly, efficiently, and on budget. What’s more, getting outside help gives smaller teams access to world-class development approaches without having to staff up and purchase expensive software licenses themselves. That’s why outsourcing a project is almost always the course of action for many of these departments.

Small IT teams usually don’t have the manpower or financial capacity to tackle a large-scale project on top of their regular duties, and outsourcing can help them focus on what they do best and provides access to expertise that they might not have in-house. In theory, it also saves time; with an outside team just focusing on the job at hand, it usually takes far less time than an internal team managing everything from start to finish. However, there are some things to have in mind when it comes to outsourcing, so smart budgeting and research are always necessary.

Choosing the wrong partner, for example, can put an organization’s reputation and bottom line at risk, as shoddy programming jeopardizes timescales, data security, and overall cost-effectiveness. Additionally, there’s always a risk of communication breakdowns when dealing with an external team far away, due to various cultural or language barriers you usually find when outsourcing. It’s also important to remember that small departments often lack resources to independently evaluate and verify the quality of code being provided by external vendors to safeguard against substandard work or a cybercrime threat of any kind, and without a dedicated team to support any issues, it can be difficult for small-scale businesses to get necessary updates and troubleshoot problems as they come up. With all these in mind, it would be smart for any IT department considering outsourced software development to extensively research their potential partners before signing on the dotted line.

This is why collaborating with a Nearshore team is often the most sensible choice for a small IT department tasked with getting a big project off the ground. After all, if you have to find the right team and resources to handle the project, and ensure that those same resources make sense and adhere to time constraints, this is where nearshore collaboration shines. By bringing together teams from remote geographical locations within reasonable distances who have a mutual agreement in terms of language, political/legal systems, and time zones. Nearshore allows small IT departments to get global access to experienced talent that will fit any strategy you have in mind, which can be a huge boon for small IT departments looking for a quick and cost-efficient way of taking big projects forward.

“Nearshore development is quickly becoming the most popular choice for businesses seeking assistance with software development without an internal team”, says Rod Aburto, Service Delivery Manager, and Partner, at Scio. “Working with a nearshore partner not only allows businesses to tap into a whole new talent pool of high caliber, who can provide resources not otherwise available, but companies also benefit from working closely with people who bring cultural competency as well as insight into best practices and processes that could potentially streamline and improve their workflow. From faster problem resolution to minimizing communication issues, Nearshore development offers everything you need while saving on costs and providing peace of mind in knowing that tasks are getting done efficiently and effectively.”

Getting the numbers right

How many software developers do I need to get my project off the ground?

So now that you have a Nearshore partner that you trust, how many developers do you need to ask for to get the project started? There are a few baselines that are a good idea to follow, but every development cycle is unique, so you’ll need to discuss with your Nearshore partner flexibility options and their insight to be sure how many people will need to participate. According to this blog, it’s a good idea to start with a team of 3 to 4 developers and 3 to 4 IT specialists, divided into the following roles:

  • One full-time Project Manager
  • Two full-time developers 
  • One full-time backend developer 
  • One part-time UX/UI designer 
  • One part-time DevOps specialist 
  • One part-time QA engineer

In the context of Nearshore, “part-time” developers may simply mean people rotating between projects because their input happens at specific moments of the development cycle, so make sure to talk to your team to discuss all the details necessary to ensure you have the talent you need. Also, remember that this estimation is very basic; considering what kind of environments you will be developing for (desktop vs. mobile, Android vs. iOS), as well as your user base (purely internally used vs. a front-facing customer application) can change these numbers dramatically. Nevertheless, with enough staff flexibility, these issues don’t matter: what matters is starting a development journey that can be a turning point for any business harnessing the power of software and technology to make a change for themselves.

In the case of Scio, home to some of the best developers in Mexico and Latin America, the close cultural ties, its Agile philosophy, and the expertise it offers after two decades of collaboration with US-based companies that needed expertise, they could only find here, the Nearshore choice is always the best one. If you want the most seamless experience as the Head of a small IT department, then this is the opportunity for you. It’s time to make a change and begin a partnership that can only lead to success.

The Key Takeaways

  • Implementing new software solutions in business is always a good decision, but for a small IT department, it can present some serious challenges getting it off the ground.
  • If the department has constraints in terms of staff and budgeting, developing their own software can be a non-starter; the expertise and skills necessary might not be there.
  • Having a good plan is key to ensure any project can take off, and one of the main questions is the number of developers necessary to make an idea into reality.
  • Nearshore, for these reasons, might be the best option for an IT department, offering the flexibility necessary to work with all kinds of resources and objectives necessary to reach a positive outcome for everyone involved.

Scio is an established Nearshore software development company based in Mexico that specializes in providing high-quality, cost-effective technologies for pioneering tech companies. We have been building and mentoring teams of engineers since 2003 and our experience gives us access not only to the knowledge but also the expertise needed when tackling any project. Get started today by contacting us about your project needs – We have teams available to help you achieve your business goals. Get in contact today!

The Great Resignation and the future of corporate cultures: Rebuilding a better software industry for all

The Great Resignation and the future of corporate cultures: Rebuilding a better software industry for all

Outsourced Engineering Team, Product Development, Project Management

Written by: Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

A Turning Point for the Software Industry

When the Great Resignation ignited in early 2021, the software industry faced more than a wave of resignations. It confronted a reckoning. Engineers walked away from long-standing roles, critical projects, and entrenched cultures that once seemed immovable. What followed was not merely an employment shift but a deep cultural reset that forced companies to question their internal structures, decision-making norms, and the human experience behind their engineering output.
This period reshaped expectations on both sides. Developers gained clarity on what they want from their careers—autonomy, respect, meaningful work, and environments where communication is reliable and leadership is accountable. Companies, in turn, realized the cost of ignoring signals that had been building long before 2021: burnout, opaque communication, inflexible policies, lack of psychological safety, and cultural disconnect.
For CTOs and engineering leaders, the Great Resignation is no longer a historical event. It’s a defining moment that continues to influence hiring, retention, project execution, and the long-term viability of software teams. To build a healthier, more resilient industry, leaders must understand what truly changed, why it matters, and what comes next.

A New Perspective on Work: The Cultural Reset

The early 2020s will be remembered as a cultural turning point for software engineering. At the height of the Great Resignation, high-performing developers left companies with little warning, sometimes exiting in the middle of mission-critical initiatives. The shift exposed a mix of organizational issues that had been tolerated for too long: technical debt buried under constant pressure to deliver, leaders who confused long hours with commitment, and communication models built on top-down directives instead of genuine alignment.
The departures were not just a response to burnout. They were a reaction to a collective realization that quality of life could not be an afterthought. Remote work proved that productivity doesn’t rely on presenteeism. Engineers learned that they could choose roles where their contributions mattered without sacrificing autonomy or personal well-being. The power dynamic subtly moved toward talent.
Organizations that struggled with this shift often faced deeper systemic challenges. The inability to adapt to remote collaboration, outdated management practices, slow decision cycles, and a lack of psychological safety created environments where disengagement grew quietly until it became impossible to ignore.
Yet, in the long term, this disruption opened the door to healthier engineering cultures. Companies were forced to rethink how they define work, collaboration, and leadership. Instead of equating success with constant urgency, forward-thinking teams began focusing on clarity, expectation-setting, humane workloads, and giving engineers the space to do deep, meaningful work.
The reset also accelerated conversations about inclusion, diversity of thought, and creating workplaces where individuals feel safe raising concerns or proposing ideas. And for distributed teams across time zones, including nearshore and hybrid models, this cultural evolution became a strategic necessity. Alignment wasn’t optional anymore—it became the backbone of operational health.
In this context, the Great Resignation didn’t damage the industry. It exposed the cracks and gave leaders the opportunity to rebuild on stronger foundations.

Rebuilding Culture After Disruption: What Leaders Must Address

Rebuilding an engineering culture after a large-scale talent departure requires more than replacing team members. It demands rebuilding trust, strengthening communication, and reassessing the relationship between leadership and the workforce. For many companies, the Great Resignation highlighted how fragile culture can become when left unexamined.
The first step is acknowledging the root causes. Developers rarely leave solely for compensation. They leave because of unresolved friction: poorly defined roles, inconsistent expectations, leadership inconsistency, limited growth opportunities, or environments where concerns are minimized instead of addressed. A resilient engineering culture begins with honest introspection across all levels.
Rebuilding trust requires transparency. Regular communication—delivered consistently, not only during crises—helps re-establish stability. Leaders who communicate openly about decisions, priorities, roadmaps, and challenges set a tone of shared accountability. This is especially important for hybrid or distributed software teams, where misalignment can expand quickly.
The next layer is redefining collaboration models. Flexible schedules, distributed work, asynchronous communication, and shared ownership are no longer perks; they are standard expectations for engineering teams. Companies that cling to rigid or outdated structures risk losing a new generation of technical talent who values autonomy and clarity.
Human Capital leaders, including those shaping culture at Scio, emphasize the importance of fostering psychological safety and building a culture where contribution is valued and voices are heard. “A sense of trust needs to be established by keeping everyone informed,” notes Helena Matamoros of Scio. “Clear communication, respectful interactions, and a welcoming environment help teams stay aligned and motivated.”
Reconstruction also requires rebalancing incentives. Team-based recognition, career development pathways, and mentorship programs give developers a sense of progress and purpose. Balanced workloads, realistic sprint commitments, and space for learning help teams avoid falling back into patterns that contributed to burnout in the first place.
Companies that invest intentionally in their culture—defining what “healthy” looks like and reinforcing it through systems and habits—set themselves up for long-term stability. Distributed teams, including nearshore partners, thrive in environments where expectations are clear and collaboration is built on mutual respect.

What Comes Next: Building the Software Industry of the Future

As the dust settles years after the Great Resignation, its long-term influence is clear: engineering cultures must continue evolving. The next phase is not merely about retaining talent; it’s about building organizations that engineers want to stay in.
The future of the industry depends on three interconnected priorities: communication, respect for individual strengths, and diversity—both demographic and cognitive. Companies that integrate these principles will be better equipped to handle complexity, scale, and rapid change.
One area where this is especially critical is team structure. Modern engineering teams are no longer local by default. Hybrid and distributed setups, with nearshore pods or remote developers collaborating across time zones, require thoughtful coordination. Communication must be intentional. Clarity must be embedded. Teams must understand how their work fits into the larger product vision.
Technical excellence also depends on cultural alignment. Innovation thrives in environments where engineers can think freely, challenge assumptions, and propose alternatives without fear of reprisal. When employees feel valued—not just as resources but as contributors with insight—their work improves and retention increases.
The industry is also seeing a shift toward skills-based hiring rather than pedigree-based hiring. After the Great Resignation, companies realized they could find exceptional developers outside traditional pipelines. This expanded global talent approach encourages stronger, more diverse engineering teams capable of solving complex problems with fresh perspectives.
Workplaces that embrace this flexibility will lead the next decade of software development. Those that revert to rigid structures or outdated management practices risk repeating the mistakes that triggered the Great Resignation in the first place.
Ultimately, the software industry’s path forward depends on creating cultures where engineers can grow, feel engaged, and contribute at a high level without sacrificing their well-being. If companies can commit to this, the next era of technology will be more stable, more innovative, and far more human.

Comparative Table: Traditional vs. Modern Engineering Culture

Aspect
Traditional Engineering Culture
Modern Engineering Culture
Leadership Style Top-down decisions Collaborative, transparent decision-making
Work Model Office-centric, synchronous Hybrid, distributed, async-friendly
Expectations Long hours, urgency as norm Sustainable workload, clarity, humane pace
Career Path Static roles, limited visibility Skills development, mentorship, flexible growth
Communication Need-to-know, occasional Frequent, consistent, open
Feedback Culture Reactive Continuous, constructive
Talent Sources Local hiring only Global and nearshore talent integration

Key Takeaways

Building a people-first engineering culture leads to better outcomes, better collaboration, and better long-term performance.

Rebuilding culture after a disruption like the Great Resignation requires trust, transparency, and reevaluating the systems that allowed issues to persist.

Involving employees at every level promotes alignment and gives teams a sense of ownership and clarity.

A healthy, people-centric culture becomes a foundation for innovation, retention, and a stronger software industry overall.

FAQ

Engineering Culture & The Great Resignation – FAQs

Why culture, clarity, and trust became decisive factors for engineering leaders.

Engineering roles often combine high pressure, ambiguous expectations, and sustained burnout. When remote work expanded global options, many developers chose environments that respected their well-being, autonomy, and long-term contribution.

Maintaining alignment and clarity across distributed or hybrid teams, while ensuring communication stays frequent, consistent, and transparent as organizations scale.

By communicating openly, resetting realistic expectations, investing in career development, and creating safe channels where engineers can raise concerns without fear of reprisal.

Because even strong architectures fail when teams are misaligned, disengaged, or burned out. Healthy culture reinforces delivery, resilience, and long-term organizational stability.

«Collaboration is at the heart of everything we do here”, or how Scio creates a culture where everyone matters.

«Collaboration is at the heart of everything we do here”, or how Scio creates a culture where everyone matters.

Nearshore, Outsourced Engineering Team, Scio

Written by: Sergio A. Martinez

The New Reality of Engineering Culture

Over the past decade, engineering teams across the U.S. have shifted their expectations of what a healthy workplace looks like. What once revolved around rigid structures and top-down direction now emphasizes transparency, shared ownership, and a culture where people can bring both their technical skills and human strengths to the table.
For CTOs and engineering leaders, this shift isn’t theoretical. It affects hiring pipelines, retention, delivery predictability, and the performance of nearshore partners supporting product teams. Developers today want more than a list of sprint tasks; they want meaningful collaboration, consistent communication, and a culture that helps them grow.
At Scio, these changes aren’t abstract trends. They shape how we build nearshore engineering teams and how we support the organizations that trust us with their products. To understand this evolution, we sat down with Helena Matamoros, Head of Human Capital at Scio, to talk about how developers have changed, how culture keeps teams aligned across borders, and why collaboration is the backbone of Scio’s work.

Section 1 — The Evolution of the Modern Developer

A decade ago, most engineering teams—especially in outsourced or nearshore environments—favored senior developers who could operate with minimal guidance, navigate legacy systems, and bring predictable stability to long-term roadmaps. Many of these engineers were already deep into their careers. They valued consistency, reliable schedules, and roles that aligned with growing family responsibilities. That workforce shaped not only technical expectations but also the cultural rhythm of engineering organizations.
“Back in 2007, early in Scio’s history, we primarily hired senior developers because the work required it,” Helena recalls. “Our teams were heavily focused on .NET projects, and we needed people with years of experience to deliver on the type of client work we handled. Most engineers were 30+, many starting families, and their priorities revolved around stability and long-term career paths.”
Today’s developer landscape looks completely different. The explosion of frameworks, cloud platforms, open-source tooling, and cross-disciplinary workflows has opened the door for a much wider range of profiles. Junior and mid-level developers arrive with strong technical foundations, exposure to collaborative tools, and a mindset shaped by community-driven learning.
This shift changed how Scio approaches culture and professional growth. Instead of relying exclusively on senior-heavy teams, Scio invests in structured career development, internal training, mentorship, and programs that allow engineers to advance quickly while staying aligned with team expectations. This internal scaffolding created space to hire promising engineers earlier in their careers and help them build the communication skills, delivery habits, and technical capabilities needed to work with U.S. clients.
Another important evolution is social. Helena highlights that today’s developers break the old “introverted engineer” stereotype. They value connection, cross-team learning, and real collaboration. “We still have many personality types,” she notes, “but openness to collaborate is far more common than it was ten years ago. People want to connect, share, and be part of something bigger than their tasks.”
This mindset is critical because collaboration isn’t a buzzword at Scio. It is a competency. It’s part of hiring. It’s part of onboarding. It is the first filter applied to anyone joining the organization.
Ultimately, the modern developer expects both technical challenges and a culture that recognizes their contributions. Scio’s role as a nearshore partner is to cultivate both.

Section 2 — How Culture Shapes Collaboration Across Borders

For engineering leaders in the U.S., one of the biggest questions when evaluating a nearshore partner is cultural alignment. Skill matters. Experience matters. But the day-to-day collaboration between distributed teams determines whether a partnership succeeds.
Scio’s cultural approach is built around a simple premise: people do their best work when they feel connected, trusted, and part of a shared mission.
A strong collaborative culture doesn’t mean constant consensus. It means shared clarity. It means knowing who to ask for help. It means understanding how one person’s work supports the goals of the team. And in remote or hybrid engineering environments, this level of alignment requires deliberate effort.
“We’re a nearshore company with talent across Mexico and Latin America,” Helena explains. “Some Scioneers visit the office often, but many work fully remote. Our challenge is making sure no one feels like they’re working alone. People want to know that what they do matters. They want to feel part of a whole.”
Scio addresses this with a culture designed to support collaboration regardless of location. That includes:
regular cross-team syncs

transparent project communication

mentorship and shared-code reviews

cultural initiatives that create shared identity

programs that celebrate learning and continuous improvement

team-building that builds trust even across time zones

This matters because engineering is rarely a solo activity. A healthy software organization depends on people who communicate context clearly, offer help without friction, and understand how to collaborate through ambiguity. A remote developer who feels connected to teammates delivers better quality, handles feedback more smoothly, and feels accountable to shared outcomes.
Scio’s culture also creates resilience. When teams work across borders, time zones, and organizations, trust becomes the multiplier that allows engineering groups to operate with speed and predictability. That trust doesn’t happen by accident. It is shaped by culture—and culture is shaped every day.

Section 3 — Why Collaboration Drives High-Performing Nearshore Teams

A nearshore engineering partner isn’t just an extension of headcount. It is an extension of culture. For U.S. engineering leaders, the success of a nearshore team depends on how well that team understands your expectations, communicates proactively, and integrates into your workflow.
That is why Scio places collaboration at the center of its operating model.
A collaborative culture accelerates delivery because it reduces friction. Engineers share knowledge more freely. They align on expectations faster. They resolve blockers early. By creating an environment where developers understand how their work fits into the broader goals of a product, Scio ensures that teams behave like true partners, not outsourced vendors.
A strong collaborative environment also creates a foundation for more accurate planning. Teams that communicate well surface risks earlier. They estimate with more context. They handle dependency management with fewer surprises. In engineering, predictability is a competitive advantage—and predictability comes from how people work together.
Another essential benefit is onboarding. When a Scio engineer joins a client team, they enter a culture where collaboration is already established as the norm. This reduces the ramp-up period and helps U.S. clients integrate new team members without losing momentum.
Internal trust also shapes quality. Peer reviews become more productive. Design conversations stay focused. Architectural decisions incorporate diverse perspectives without turning into bottlenecks. When engineers trust each other and feel valued, they’re more willing to propose solutions, highlight risks, and take responsibility for their impact on the product.
This collaborative foundation is why Scio focuses on building teams—long-term, aligned engineering groups—not isolated contractors. When developers understand the culture and expectations of both Scio and the client, they can deliver consistent, high-quality work that compounds over time.
To illustrate the contrast between engineering environments that support performance and those that struggle with it, here is a simple comparative module.

Comparative Table: Collaborative vs. Non-Collaborative Teams

Area
Collaborative Team
Non-Collaborative Team
Communication Clear, frequent, and proactive Inconsistent and reactive
Knowledge Sharing Structured peer reviews and mentorship Silos and limited visibility
Delivery Predictability Stable, low-friction workflows Frequent surprises and delays
Team Morale High engagement and ownership Low trust and disengagement

Section 4 — How Scio Builds a Culture Where Everyone Matters

The foundation of Scio’s culture is intentional design. Every program—from hiring to mentorship—is built around the idea that people do better work when they feel seen, supported, and part of a community.
Helena highlights that Scio invests heavily in helping developers understand how their contributions connect to real product outcomes. This alignment creates meaning, reduces ambiguity, and strengthens a developer’s sense of purpose. Engineers aren’t just delivering tasks; they’re contributing to a shared goal with the client.
Creating a place where “everyone matters” requires more than friendly interactions. It requires:
clear expectations

 

consistent communication

fair opportunities for growth

recognition that values consistency over competition

mentorship that helps developers level up

development plans that support long-term careers

Many nearshore or offshore vendors prioritize throughput. Scio prioritizes people. This isn’t altruistic; it’s operational strategy. High-performing teams emerge when people feel supported, trusted, and connected.
Scio also focuses on building the kind of culture that clients can feel. When a U.S. engineering leader joins a call with a Scio team, they experience the professionalism, clarity, and cohesion that come from a culture where people feel valued. That’s the difference between hiring individuals and partnering with a unified team.
“Collaboration is at the heart of everything we do,” Helena emphasizes. “It isn’t something we add on top. It’s the way we hire, the way we build teams, and the way we support our clients.”
For engineering leaders evaluating nearshore partners, this cultural backbone is often what separates successful long-term partnerships from transactional staffing relationships. A strong culture compounds. It reduces risk. It improves predictability. It elevates product quality. And it creates a partnership that grows with you.

FAQ

Collaboration & Culture at Scio – FAQs

How collaboration, culture, and growth practices shape high-performing nearshore engineering teams.

Collaboration improves delivery predictability, strengthens communication, reduces friction, and helps distributed teams align closely with U.S. product expectations and decision-making rhythms.

Through intentional communication practices, structured mentorship, ongoing training, and cultural programs designed to build a shared identity across teams and locations.

A culture built on clarity, shared expectations, continuous learning, and collaboration—allowing developers to integrate smoothly into U.S. engineering workflows as true team members.

Through Scio Elevate, mentorship, workshops, technical training, and individualized development plans that support long-term growth within stable client partnerships.

Hiring a software development team?: Red flags to watch out for when working Nearshore

Hiring a software development team?: Red flags to watch out for when working Nearshore

Nearshore, Outsourced Engineering Team

Curated by: Sergio A. Martínez

Opting to collaborate with a Nearshore development team is always a great idea, allowing your organization to reach a talented pool of developers within the same time zone, and whose expertise is ready to help you reach your best possible outcome without sacrificing communication or compromising quality in any way. Latin America, for example, boasts some of the more skilled and knowledgeable developers in the world, so for any US-based company that wants to augment their dev teams, a Nearshore is the best solution.

Hiring-a-software-development-team-Red-flags-icono

However, how to make sure you are choosing the best company to work with? Are there any red flags that your organization should watch out for before making a decision that will make or break your project? As it happens, when you’re looking to hire a software development company, there are a few warning signs that you should be aware of, in order to guarantee that you are choosing the correct Nearshore company or team to collaborate with. So, when approaching a potential partner, ask yourself…

1. What does their online presence look like?

It’s no secret that first impressions are important; when you meet someone for the first time, you form an impression of them based on their appearance, their demeanor, and the way they carry themselves. The same is true for businesses. 

 When you’re considering working with any development company, one of the first things you’ll do is research them online. Their website, their social media presence, and the way they communicate with potential clients all play a role in shaping your opinion of them. And in today’s competitive market, it’s more important than ever for software development companies to make a good impression online. A well-designed website and active social media accounts show that a company is modern, relevant, and engaged with its potential clients, as well as showing that the company is serious about its business and that it has the resources to invest in its online presence. By contrast, a company with a poorly designed website or no social media presence sends the message that, at best, it’s out of touch with the realities of modern businesses. First impressions still matter, so always be wary of any company that doesn’t seem to care about their online look.

2. Other people’s opinions are always useful

If you’re thinking about hiring an external development team, it’s always a good idea to get some input from other people. After all, you want to make sure that you’re making the best possible decision, and there are a few different ways to go about this. You can ask people you know who have used Nearshore software development companies in the past for their recommendations or read online reviews and testimonials to get a sense of what other people’s experiences have been like. You can even reach out to the companies themselves and ask for references. By taking the time to do your research, you’ll be much more likely to end up working with a company that’s a good fit for your needs.

3. Look closely at their business processes

Going Nearshore is a big decision. You want to find a company that will be able to meet your needs and deliver on its promises, so pay attention to these warning signs and you’ll be more likely to hire a great software development company. With a clear understanding of what you’re getting offered, you can feel confident that you’re making the best choice for your business:

  • Fixed-bid pricing. With an external software development company, there are a few different pricing models to consider. One of the most popular options is fixed bid pricing. This model means that the company quotes a single price for the entire project, regardless of how long it actually takes to complete, which may seem like a good deal at first glance but has some potential drawbacks to be aware of. First of all, fixed bid pricing can incentivize companies to lowball their initial quote in order to win your business, and as a result, you may end up paying more in the long run as the company tries to make up for their mistake. Additionally, fixed bid pricing can lead to scope creep when a company tries to add extra features or requirements that were not originally included in the project, leading to higher costs and delays. In general, it’s best to avoid fixed bid pricing when choosing a software development partner, instead negotiating an hourly, monthly, or even yearly rate so that you can be sure you’re getting what you pay for.

  • Suspicious estimates. Accurate estimates are important. A good estimate will give you a realistic idea of what to expect in terms of cost, timeline, and scope. It will also help you identify any potential risks during development, so this information is essential in making an informed decision. Therefore, when you’re talking to a potential software development company, be sure to ask lots of questions about their process and their experience; if they can’t give you straight answers, that’s another red flag, and too good to be true estimates are cause for concern, as they often lead to cost overruns and schedule delays. When reviewing estimates, always ask for clarification if anything seems unrealistic.

  • Unclear (or absent) feedback loops. Software development is a complex and error-prone process. Even with the best planning and management, things can go wrong, which is why a feedback loop is an important part of any development process, and critical when working with an external team. Without a clear feedback loop in place, it can be difficult to manage expectations, track progress, and identify potential problems. In addition, a feedback loop helps to create a sense of accountability and ensures that issues are addressed promptly. As a result, taking the time to establish a clear feedback loop process with your external partner is always worth the investment, and if the company doesn’t have a clear and established process to receive and implement it into the project, a negative outcome is all but guaranteed at the end.

Nearshore the right way

Nearshore the right way

“In Nearshore development, working with the right company is essential to guarantee the best outcome. The collaboration and communication between the client and the development team are critical, as well as the skills and expertise to meet your specific needs”, explains Luis Aburto, CEO and Co-Founder of Scio. “In addition, the right Nearshore development company will have a deep understanding of the local market, which is essential for success. With the right partner, you can be confident that your development project will always reach your goals.”

So, when it comes to Nearshore software development, working with the right partner ensures a successful outcome if you look for the right “green flags” that a good Nearshore development company offers, guaranteeing the best result:

  • First, collaboration is key. A good partner should work closely with you to understand your specific needs and goals, and then develop a customized plan to ensure that those needs are met. Collaboration ensures that everyone is on the same page and that the final product meets your expectations.
  • Second, communication is key. The right company will keep you up to date on the project’s progress and address any concerns you may have along the way, understanding that effective communication is essential to maintaining a good working relationship.
  • Finally, skill is key. A Nearshore company looking to improve your project will have a team of skilled professionals who are experts in their field. They’ll be able to handle every aspect of the project, from start to finish, ensuring a high-quality final product.

In short, while there is no definitive answer to choosing the right software development partner, due diligence and being wary of companies that make unrealistic promises, seem unprofessional or secretive, or do not have a good reputation in the industry is still the best strategy. By keeping an eye out for these warning signs, you can find the right partner to help you achieve your business goals, choosing a company that has the experience, communicates effectively, and has the best-skilled professionals. Doing so will always guarantee the best outcome for your project.

The Key Takeaways

  • Nearshore augmentation is the best solution if you want to ensure your project has all the talent, skill, and collaboration necessary to make it a success.
  • There are many options out there, so knowing how to look for red flags when choosing a partner is critical to ensure success.
  • Among those red flags, getting unrealistic promises, unclear business practices and a lacking online presence are always indicators of a dubious partner in development.
  • On the other hand, a transparent company with clear communication and collaboration processes like the ones Scio offers can guarantee a smooth development experience, and thus, the positive outcome your organization is seeking.

Scio is an established Nearshore software development company based in Mexico that specializes in providing high-quality, cost-effective technologies for pioneering tech companies. We have been building and mentoring teams of engineers since 2003 and our experience gives us access not only to the knowledge but also the expertise needed when tackling any project. Get started today by contacting us about your project needs – We have teams available to help you achieve your business goals. Get in contact today!